Category Archives: Leadership

Consultative Solutions Beat Hard Closes

In times past, “good” salespeople  had a method to close out a meeting with a prospect that was successful in getting them to “sign on the dotted line.” In some industries, the sales function is described as business development because of stereotypes of sleazy salespeople who use high pressure techniques to cajole an uncertain buyer into a (sometimes regrettable) decision. This is especially true in business services firms, where there is a stigma in many cases about seeking out new business at all.

The biggest development of the past few decades has been the consultative selling approach. Yet, even this shift is not satisfactory for people who just do not like the word “sales.” When I have been working alongside attorneys and CPAs, for instance, the terms “client development” or “business development” are much preferred. In general, these practitioners provide offerings that have long sales cycles or are perceived as commodities. So…to unlock the motivation of my clients to do the development that is needful for practice growth, I usually have a series of conversations and trainings around the concept that client service requires a similar approach. Few argue that client service is needful.

Rich Grehalva writes and speaks about the array of sales/business development models:

CLOSING SALES MODEL
The 1950’s introduced this model, which concentrated on the product being heavily emphasized.
Key Elements:
✗ Presentation Skills
✗ Trial Closing
✗ Overcoming Objections
✗ Final Close
This model is still in use today, usually in high-pressure sales.

PRODUCT/SERVICE PUSHING THROUGH
PERSONALITY, PERSISTENCE AND PRICE
➲ The salesperson is tenacious, persistent and usually has a low-cost item and works on a numbers game.
➲ The natural born salesperson enjoys interfacing with people and usually has an engaging personality.

RELATIONSHIP SALES MODEL
➲ The salesperson builds a relationship, over time, with repeated visits.
➲ The buyer and seller get to know each other on a personal and professional level.

PROBLEM-SOLVING SALES MODEL (1960’s)
Focusing on:
➲ Open-ended questions – Role-playing is used with students to get them to understand how to get clients or prospects to talk about the things that are important to them.
➲ Closed-ended questions – Closed-ended questions require a yes or no response.
➲ Listening skills is a key component.
➲ The salesperson takes the information and then presents solutions.

VALUE ADD SALES MODEL (appeared in late 1960’s).
Price objections raised by the “Problem-Solving Sales Model” can be countered by adding additional services. In this way, adding these services to the base product/service gives a perception of the value received versus the price.

CONSULTATIVE SALES MODEL (surfaced in early 1970’s)
➲ Determines how to lower the clients costs and/or
➲ Determines how to increase the client’s revenues The company requires a depth of understanding of their clients’ business, as well as a solid track record in delivering proven results. Start-ups find it difficult to compete in this
type of sales model.

PARTNERING
This model became the buzzword used by salespeople–not in creating a legal entity, but in building a joint plan for
creating an opportunity. The sale is conducted at the highest level of the company and an output is a business plan
targeted at a niche within the clients’ market. The term partnering became highly overused and misused. Clients and
prospects soon tired of hearing the word.

TEAM SELLING MODEL
Though not new, the Team Selling Model became increasingly more integrated into the sales model. The salesperson
in this model must coordinate all of the activities within the organization and external to the organization, in order to
win the business.

COMPLEX SALES MODEL
✗ Large ticket sales
✗ Multiple decision makers
✗ Extensive coordination, both internal and external
✗ Long lead times
The role of the salesperson involves taking on a strategic role in developing win themes, internal politics, competitor
analysis, and legislation, as examples.

It is important to think about your client base, your reputation and brand, your team–whether they are salesmen or technical people who happen to need to bring in business, and what your goal is. (Hint: a sale that is undone a year later when the client is not retained is not an accomplishment.) In general, it is best to educate and involve the prospect, help them feel good about choosing your company, and guide them through letting the current provider go. When we consistently approach prospects with consultative solutions rather than hard closes, then we are developing business rather than selling.

Resist the Urge to Resist Change!

Innovation is a word that is bantered about unwittingly by many. From its Latin root, it generally means to renew or change. Yet, many reduce innovation to invention—as in product-specific concepts come to fruition and production. If we faithfully apply the definition, innovation may be seen to pertain to any ideas to effect positive change that go from origination to transformation to implementation to systemization within an organization.

To make the mental transition from viewing innovation as invention to what it really is, one must see innovation as culturally transformative. What was can no longer be what is, and certainly not what shall be. Change is hard for many people. Making a commitment to continuous change can be downright overwhelming. Yet, choosing to take action when others are stagnant can create tremendous strategic advantage. Look at Steve Jobs and Apple after the dotcom bust of the new millennium.  As others shrank from R&D, fearful that the technology boom was forever dead, his group increased investment in innovation and they have prospered for it. Think Apple and technology are an isolated company/industry? Explain away the following mix of companies founded during poor economies: Disney, CNN, Hyatt, Burger King, FedEx, Gillette, AT&T, Merck, Coors, IHOP, Fortune, GE, and the Jim Henson Company.

During the agricultural age, the asset everyone wanted was land and the critical success factor was yield. Agriculture gave way to industry with manufacturing and processing facilities and their efficiency defining success. As information became a greater commodity than industry, computers and their speed became the yardsticks. Today, in the creative age, innovation is the key asset and, as a means of differentiation, determines ultimate success.

If your organization is to remain/become competitive in the current world economy and proliferation of information sharing, it is unlikely to do so without making a commitment to continuous improvement. Again, so as to not confuse this phrase with the Deming’s work in documenting kaizen approaches to manufacturing in Japan, let’s define what is meant. We are speaking here of a core value within an organization to not accept the status quo—to not become complacent.

In a Business Week survey conducted in conjunction with the Boston Consulting Group in 2008, it was noted that total shareholder return (TSR) was greater over a three, five, and ten year period among business model innovators versus their industry peers.  Notice that it was those who innovated their business model rather than those who tried to hold onto their old one who prospered! TSR was greater among global innovators than the S&P 1200, greater among U.S. innovators than the S&P 500, greater among European innovators than the S&P Euro 350, and greater among Asian innovators than the S&P Asian composite.

“Wealth flows from innovation not from optimization.  Wealth is not created from perfecting the known, but imperfectly seizing the unknown.”

-Kevin Kelly, founding editor of Wired

 

In 1989, Smith Corona had annual sales of $500 million, producing typewriters. Word processing and computerization overtook their market position and they could not innovate fast enough to ride the wave. Jeremy Gutsche of trendhunter.com says, “Be wary of your strengths; success leads to complacency.” He maintains that, over time, most people stop trying. Need convincing?

  1. “We own that market.”
  2. “He’s been a client forever.”
  3. “She’s already my girlfriend.”

Gutsche cites each of these statements as examples of a pervasive attitude of entrenchment. Since most people are risk averse, we have learned to polish the “spin” on our actions and speak glibly of “tweaking” and “optimizing.” Instead, successful people and organizations must learn to pursue that which is splendid, unique, and paradigm-changing.

The secret, though, is to not just produce an innovative product or service; to not just culturally innovate, but to commit to innovation and change continuously. Daunting? You bet it is! How can you lead yourself and others to protect the value that innovation has created? How can change be “maintained?” This is a rhetorical question—it can’t! Change cannot be maintained—it must itself be changed to remain responsive, relevant & vibrant!!!

Getting Entrepreneurs Unstuck

So many businesses start with grand visions and hopes, only to miss the mark along the way. In our home state of North Carolina, 26000 businesses are started each year; but, 23000 fail each year as well. Without getting into the dynamics of how many survive for three or five years, we can at least ask the question “why?” Why do so many businesses fail each year?

Mismanagement, making mistakes others have already made, inadequate capitalization, and poor knowledge of systems and process resources are all contributors to business failure. The reason many of these mistakes are made is the lack of a sounding board for many entrepreneurs–someone to whom they can turn for ideas, resources, and encouragement. For centuries, there were very formalized apprenticeship programs in many industries that helped new workers become business people. In modern times, we use the term “mentor” to describe someone who is willing to work with an apprentice.

Management of a business is tough work. Having a mentor can make a big difference. Some of the things a mentor can offer include:

  • Business strategy and planning to make sure their business is focused on a viable market with a winning product and/or service that has a competitive edge
  • Forecasting and financing ensuring that sales plans are realistic and that cash is well managed
  • Operational discipline and judgment to increase the chances of success by making fewer mistakes
  • Industry connections that can help accelerate the business and its operations
  • Start-up company experience that can instill the wisdom of what it takes to really start and manage an emerging business

Organizations like EntreDot and incubators like the Cary Innovation Center and REDii in downtown Raleigh are but a few of the many resources that smart business owners seek out. The value is in having someone on site who can walk and talk  you through an issue that is new to you. The “someone” is often one who has more experience in business, but can also be a peer in these incubator environments.

Getting “stuck” on a tough issue is okay; staying in that predicament can put jobs, ideas, and investments at risk of loss. Regardless of whether you live in a community that has ready providers of mentoring or have to seek it from elsewhere, it is vitally important to your success to get help. Becoming “unstuck” makes life more enjoyable, fuels the economy, and builds better communities. Best wishes!

Root Causes of Executive Failure

Smart leaders make dumb decisions. This statement should come as no surprise. The questions we should ask, though, are why? when? and how? By attacking the root causes and attempting to understand the character issues, we can “peel the onion” and see what is so potently wrong when poor decisions are made and executives fail.

Do you know a leader who sees himself and the company dominating its environment? If so, they collectively are set up for a fall. The basic fallacious assumption is that success in one domain can be infinitely translated into every other domain.

Similarly, the executive who treats the business as a private empire blurs the necessary distinctions between the personality and the entity. Beware the (wo)man who uses position to attempt to carry our personal ambitions. Those who see themselves as stewards of a resource as opposed to royalty seem to avoid this trap.

Know-it-alls are another type of failure waiting to happen. Those who feel they must look polished and do not invite the input of others suffer from hubris that is unhealthy. Being decisive without considering alternative views and related outcomes is not a sign of executive skillfulness.

Slash & burn is not just a rain forest dangerous practice–it is also bad for a talent management policy. We’ve all seen mobster movies where opposing viewpoints are literally snuffed out. When an executive does this inside a business, it shows a lack of appreciation for objectivity. More than likely, decisions will be weaker and mid-course corrections will be missed.

Is the top executive an attention hog? Choosing appearance over substantive management can be a fatal character flaw. Hyper-focus with image can also mean that underlying, important issues like financial performance are not getting the attention they should.

Trying to vision-cast one’s way around a hurdle instead of approaching it head-on is almost always a huge mistake. Shrugging off a problem or pretending it is inconsequential shows immaturity and a lack of executive responsibility. It’s more than okay to admit a problem exists–in doing so, we invite others to help us resolve it and the organization benefits.

Fascination with the past as opposed to staying in the moment is a final way executives doom their organizations to failure. As we’ve heard it said, “what got you here won’t get you there!” Embracing innovation is a good habit of top leaders.

Sydney Finkelstein addresses many of these issues in greater depth in Why Executives Fail, a book published a few years ago that examines case studies of companies that once thrived and then took a nose dive. Similar to Good to Great in its treatment of lessons learned, the book highlights problems with mindsets, information management, and habits.

 

Pick 7 Marketing Trends for 2012

Lists can be so helpful for us to get our minds around the critical messages for a given subject. In a deliberate play on words, I wanted to juxtapose a “Pick 7” lottery concept with a “7 Marketing Trends” informational piece. Collectively, we can agree that any “list” is one person’s opinion and that it really is a “luck of the draw” as to whether applying someone else’s  recommended best practices will make a difference in your given market. Yet…simply attacking the subject matter sharpens our minds, encourages us to support our strategies with sound arguments, and generally makes for better decision-making! So…the list:

  • Location, Location, Location: Check-ins match message with timing
  • People are People: Listen, observe & match individualized message to feedback
  • Not One Size Fits All: Designing for multiple devices
  • Customers for Life: Customer retention through engaging multiple times
  • Behavior Speaks: Connect individuals based on how they interact with you
  • “Mocial”: Email, mobile, local & social
  • Dynamic Email: Static content is passe’; modernize!

With help from the folks at Silverpop, we hope to help you understand what’s at stake in each of these trends so that you may consider the impact to your marketing strategy and implementation. Location: think Facebook, Twitter & Foursquare–it’s important to help your customers share your brand with their friends. By combining incentives for people to let others know they frequent your business with intention in making it easy for your story to be told via email or social networks, you are able to create a user experience that keeps them coming back.

People: King Arthur Flour found that, by simply including quotes from customers in its emails, it was able to increase open rates, orders, and sales by 30%. What are you doing to move away from a generic message to a highly tailored one with a human element that is more engaging?

Device-specific: Smartphones and tablets are overtaking the computer world. Design with this in mind. If someone’s finger has to do the “clicking,” then spread clickable items out from one another and create “buttons” that are easy to use. Think about what you do/don’t like about viewing a website on a smaller device; make changes accordingly.

Retention: We’ve always heard that the customers we already have are the best ones and that soliciting a new one takes a ton of effort. Whether you are emailing those who have abandoned their online shopping carts, or reaching out with special campaigns to those who don’t usually open your emails, it’s important to think about getting as high a return as possible on the relationships we already have.

Behavior: Create a marketing database to track who visits your website, blog, online store, etc, what they do while there, whether they share your brand, and so on. Use tools like CRM to help track and segment your targets into smaller groups to whom you can send very tailored messages. Observe the response to the custom communications and refine what you send out.

“Mocial”: is a phrase used at Silverpop to explain the inter-connectedness of media and communications. What the connectivity means for you as a marketer is that thought must be given to how messages flow across platforms, how brand leadership can be stimulated and captured, and how to get users to check you out in as many formats as you are active.

Dynamic email: That should be enough to say on this subject, but some of us are thick-skinned (and -headed!) Consider: Air New Zealand sends customized pre-flight emails to passengers with information about booked destinations, crew members who will be serving on the flight, and social media buttons to share cultural articles, photos, videos etc about the local weather, itinerary or other matters of interest.

Challenging to think about? You bet! Determine to become a stronger marketer in 2012.