Tag Archives: Employee

Don’t Make a Monkey Out of Innovation

 

 

The story is told of five monkeys who were a part of an experiment studying group theory. Inside the cage wherein they were placed, a ladder led to a bunch of tantalizing bananas. What the test subjects initially did not know was that a high-pressure water hose was attached to the ladder.

One eager monkey raced up the ladder, reaching for one of the tasty bananas, only to cause the entire cage to be deluged with water. Undeterred, another monkey made her own attempt to reach the top. When she ascended the ladder, all the monkeys were again treated to a downpour. The lesson began to sink in–if any one of us tries to reach for the banana bunch, we are all going to get soaked, and that is unpleasant.

As the original test group was substituted out for individual newcomers, one by one the new arrival would make an effort to scale the ladder for the tasty treat. However, the existing group, fearing the dousing, would beat the newcomer down before he could make it to the top. The cycle was repeated, with the same result, until all the original monkeys had been replaced.

When the water hose was removed, it didn’t affect the curiosity of the monkeys–they had learned to avoid the bananas.

In most organizations, there is a built-in resistance to trying new things–particularly if hard lessons had been learned that discourage innovation. It is as though the expectation of risk bringing failure or reprimand begins to thwart spontaneity and creativity, until “group think” has overtaken individual expression. As you think about your own organization, to what degree does this thought process embed itself in your company culture?

Organizations who want to improve their organizational culture need to go to work on the four dynamics above. Perspective, defined as the way we look at the future and the problems we are trying to solve, determines destiny. If it is one’s approach to always be logical, for instance, that is a matter of perspective–not necessarily a reality for all player’s in a niche market. Lou Gerstner, in speaking about his turnaround of IBM, said, “I came to see in my time at IBM that culture isn’t just one aspect of the game–it is the game.” Some of the changes he made seemed like semantics, but his commitment to them made a huge difference:

  • Shift the focus from product to customer
  • Shift from “value me” (silo) to “value us” (the whole)
  • Shift from analysis paralysis to making decisions with 80% knowledge and moving forward

Experimental failure means creating a safe environment in which ideas can be tested and allowed to fail without the idea person being labeled a failure. Instead of making minor adjustments to what exists today, we need to foster an attitude that looks for tomorrow’s breakthroughs. Often, complacency is the doom of a department, division, or business. It has been said that we grow most in the valleys. If you are a part of an organization that only wants to play “king of the hill” through entrenchment, you should look for your next opportunity today!

Disruptive innovation begins with a deep understanding of the needs of your target audience. Customer obsession is an intentional effort to connect and engage..especially on an emotional level. When the connection is made, your product or service resonates with the customer in such a way that she cannot imagine a world without your offering as a part of her life.

Breaking down worn-out structures and processes that hinder our vision of market dynamics allows us to adapt effectively. Intentional destruction challenges the assumption that a strong titular leader makes an organization high-performing. Instead, ideology becomes the unifying factor. Empowered employees can react more quickly and build greater team capabilities that those languishing under an unwieldy reporting structure.

As you look at these recommended area to improve your organizational culture (thanks, by the way, to Jeremy Gutsche, again, for articulating many of these ideas in his writings), determine one thing you can obtain buy-in to change this week and do it!

 

 

Dirty Martini Intrapreneurship

One  of the portals I use to stay abreast of innovation is called Alltop. It is organized by author and an author by the name of Gregg Fraley caught my attention last week. Gregg had written an article entitled, “Do You Want Innovation or a Dirty Martini.” Rather than describe the whole article for you (or violate his copyright), I offer you the following excerpt:

note: Haley references the topic of management engagement in innovation and some “interesting posts lately byPaul Hobcraft”

I think many high level executives simply don’t know what they have. Until it’s too late.

There are a lot of smart people out there, with great ideas. Talent is something you need if you really want to innovate. And yet, really, most organizations already have that talent. No, not every employee is Jony Ives and is an impact player at that level, but nearly every company has some people that, under the right circumstances, can hit home runs (score goals, set records, win gold, etc.). Ives himself was locked in a closet before Steve Jobs found the key.

In my travels doing talks and such I often have a chance to chat with line workers and middle managers who are beyond frustrated. They have ideas, they have energy, they care about the company — and none of that goodness is being channeled towards innovation. In fact, it’s being actively suppressed in some cases.

The phenomenon that Haley describes is one in which many organizations, even reading about Google or Cisco, who both encourage creativity and innovation, are faltering. Their people are full of great potential that largely goes untapped because there is not a means to commercialize new ideas (or even pursue new methods) because management is not intentional about cultivating input from others–especially those outside the management side of the building. Haley goes on to argue that even those with creative talent, who are often recruited to organizations that need the proverbial “breath of fresh air,” find that their approach is not valued and they begin looking for their next opportunity too soon after joining an organization that so desperately needs them but is not accommodating to them.

He says, “C-suite types, hear this, if you knew  how much talent is wasting away right under your nose, you’d cry in your martini. Don’t believe it? Ask. Ask a sampling of your people the simple question — where are the hidden gems around here? You’ll find out things you didn’t know. People with secret projects, big ideas they’ve been holding back, crazy ideas that just might work…Want to turn the situation around? Ask another question — what’s holding you back?”

I would add to the questions he asks the following:

What are you doing to foster a culture of innovation?

Here are some suggestions–

  1. Change the way you form work teams. Build diversity of thought into as many teams as possible.
  2. Change your own role from decision maker to facilitator. See yourself as primarily responsible to help others shine and succeed.
  3. Create a knowledge management system that captures lessons learned and best practices to be disseminated broadly and consistently.
  4. Celebrate when an employee takes initiative. Find ways to acknowledge them openly.
  5. Get rid of the traditional research and development process. Instead of a department, create an inter-departmental group that represents not just different disciplines, but also different levels of experience and different demographics.

Intrapreneurship is on the rise among savvy competitors. It does not, however,  come without a price–ego has to be checked at the door and individuals valued for their unique contributions.  Your challenge is to retain creative talent that otherwise would start their own businesses or work for more progressive competitors!

Small Business Management Information and Organizational Staffing

Different-sized businesses have different needs in terms of internal structure and systems, particularly during times of economic decline. As the entrepreneur adapts to changes in his or her competitive situation, the size of the business may vary enough to put it in competition with either larger or smaller competitors. Implementing systems to match competitive requirements is a necessary first step toward efficient organization and operation.

Management Information Systems

Small businesses usually enjoy the pace a smaller organization and a high level of personal involvement in decision-making. The systems typically in place range from a manual bookkeeping system inadequate in reporting timely developments to overly complex programs that require more attention than the small business leader can give. Therefore, the goal in a small operation should be to minimize company reliance on record-keeping as a chore and focus on the development of meaningful reports. With all systems tied together, the financial systems can work with marketing and operations systems. The reports generated can then be used by each department.

Accounting Information

Accounting information that should exist in at least a semi-automated form includes accounts payable, cash projections, expense estimating, and quotation systems. It is impossible to run an efficient operation with anything less than this skeleton. The payables are easily recordable as invoices are received and paid. Cash projections contain–at a minimum–information about loans, revenues, and disbursements. A basic expense estimating system posts invoice amounts  (direct costs) and allocates indirect  costs as appropriate to to specific projects or clients. Finally, a method of preparing quotes should be implemented to standardize pricing based on cost data.

Marketing Information

Marketing information should include inventory listings, commission agreements, advertising schedules, and research into market demand and competitor product offerings. Inventory listings are a natural by-product of the job costing (expense estimating) system and should include gross profit percentages, inventory age, and a measurement of the relative sales priority of inventory based on carrying costs. Commission agreements highlight the sales force’s expectations for representation of company products. Advertising schedules will help the business leaders plan for regular promotions. Finally, research into market demand and competitor product offerings will require periodic updates.

Operations Information

While accounting information is preferably computerized or otherwise automated, operations information, like marketing, need not be automated as a first priority. Information systems for monitoring operations include purchase orders, scheduling, and either timekeeping or job progress. A purchase order system is essential for cost controls, order documentation, and verification of amounts and qualities delivered. Finally, scheduling systems provide for systematic fulfillment of orders.

Organizational Staffing

Small businesses must determine the organizational development and staffing levels based on their need to delegate tasks and thus free themselves for critical activities. Office management, marketing and operations managers should be hired only after careful screening. These individuals need to possess industry specific experience and a good general feel for how your business works. Sales people and administrative staff are not innately qualified to work for a particular organization. When verifying references and conducting interviews, then, look for a match in values!

Office Management Staff

In the management of the office functions, organization and attention to details are essential. One or two well-trained individuals–preferably capable of performing each other’s jobs–should be enough to keep the internal operations running smoothly and to help with some of the company’s daily busy work when necessary. Ideally, these office employees should be able to handle accounting, calls, filing, and word processing.

Marketing Staff

The marketing staff need not consist of one or two well-trained individuals either. One person must have responsibility for digital marketing–all things web-based including website, social media, and CRM. The other should handle strategy and supporting sales and other executive staff on marketing issues, including advertising, branding, collateral materials, proposals, etc.

Operations Management

A team of one or two should again be sufficient. Depending on the size of the organization, the complexity of its operation, and the rate of growth, a good rule of thumb is that one manager should have responsibility for no more than five to eight direct reports. These managers should be expert in keeping work on time and on budget.

 

Entrepreneurs: Learn to Delegate to Capable Employees

Delegation

The “take charge” attitude that permeates a builder’s very makeup is easily channeled and tempered with proper direction and focus. Avoiding “one man rule” tendencies is as easy as one word: delegation. The effective executive delegates rather than performing all critical tasks. However, successful delegation requires that responsibility and authority also be delegated. Herein lies a problem for the executive–“hands off” management.

An experienced founder’s abilities and characteristics relate to starting and preserving a good business idea. Chief among those abilities would be creating a vision for the company, which is usually unstated but somehow understood. While it may seem a chore for others in the company, projecting a confident and self-assured image that appeals to prospective buyers  comes naturally to the experienced executive.

Additionally, identification of market opportunities and provision of top notch service to meet customer needs are focal points of the founder’s vision. Unfortunately, the ability to create a workable organization to achieve company goals and objectives may prove more elusive. The business owner who possesses the innate skill to attract others to pursue an unwritten vision may lack the skill to build an efficient organization.

Employees

Clearly, employees are critical to the success of profit maximization in any business; it is their effort that keeps the wheels of progress turning. Most employees have spent careers in similarly sized (small) companies in the same industry setting–be that white collar or blue collar–with limited exposure to alternate environments. Consequently, their frame of reference in employer/employee relationships amounts  to that which the founder and, where applicable, previous employers have provided.  With limited cross-training in other professional disciplines, these members of the team have the least job flexibility and therefore generally welcome changes in work flow patterns that can make their jobs appreciably easier and more effective.

Job Specialization

While cross training or shared skill sets occur as a matter of necessity, job specialization is a focus of many small businesses. A certain “pride of ownership” can arise from this high degree of specialization. Fiercely loyal, most employees would rather sacrifice some temporary perks rather than leave a benevolent employer “high and dry” in a time of financial duress. Since the employees tend to be skill-oriented, they require a great deal of direction in defining work assignments. At the same time, they spend a lot of time observing the founder and mimicking his or her efforts; if the entrepreneur is a go-getter, they will learn to hustle on the job in order to meet production requirements. In short, employees can be extremely valuable in performing the legwork that makes the business optimization a reality.

Employee Responsibilities

Employees are required to adhere to schedules, commit to the strategic plan, be willing to work long hours, and be brand ambassadors of the company in the community. Schedules governing production, documentation, and reporting must be religiously followed to ensure optimal work efficiencies. Time, budget, and administration constraints are to be respected and emphasized among employees and their  supervisors.

Mindful of how they represent the company, your people are the “front line” experience that others have with your brand. Whether buying from suppliers, meeting with customers, or serving in a local non-profit, they have an opportunity to make you look great–or not.

When company plans cause inconveniences for employees, it should be up to the employees themselves to raise the issue with their superiors. Once they have been given the right to voice their opinions and concerns, they should be expected to fall in line with the plan. Failure to follow established guidelines should not be tolerated. Without respect of your core values, your employees should be replaced by those who can carry your banner proudly!

 

Management Direction and the Turnaround

With the necessary financial and operational restructuring, plus the marketing re-positioning, it is easy to overlook a key factor that often proves to be critical to successful turnarounds: staff motivation. Reorganizing and involving not just the management team, but also the rank-and-file  are two essential tasks. The entire company must be pulling in the same direction to achieve optimal success. Involvement creates a “can-do” atmosphere that spreads to vendors, customers, and other stakeholders.

Involving Staff

It is imperative that appropriate changes be made to show that the executive team is committed to “doing whatever it takes.” Key employees should be encouraged to take an active role in the turnaround process, ensuring that they feel they are a vital part of the solution. Regularly scheduled management meetings are the new norm. In times of crisis, these meetings may need to occur daily; in profitable times biweekly should be adequate. Finding yourself and the team somewhere between crisis and optimization may be reason to vary the frequency of meetings, but they should never be more sporadic than once every two weeks.

Motivation

Do not be afraid to ask employees their opinions about what motivates them to perform. These opinions can be used to develop performance measurements and incentive plans. Scrutiny of company policy manuals and benefits offered can help identify ways to enhance engagement. Also, discovering the most frequently encountered problems can reveal how managers are applying–or failing to apply–useful solutions. Project descriptions, summaries of the company’s performance in adhering to budget and time constraints, and brainstorming time to recommend better methods are good synergy building activities.

Evaluation

Some companies like to administer tests of ability to prospective employees. Yet, once the prospects are hired, there is very little training and development. Close supervision should yield observations about areas for improvement. It is the responsibility of management to find ways to challenge employees to grow in their capabilities–both technical and soft skills–throughout their careers. Developing professional growth plans and holding folks accountable to execute them is good for all. Tying performance measurement to the plans shows employees that you are serious about continuous improvement and results-based management.

Teamwork

The team is also responsible for cultivating the management team concept in hiring employees, meeting goals and objectives, and conducting individual performance reviews. In addition, management’s performance should be reviewed to locate and remove any team members who are preventing goals and objectives from being met.

Hiring people who complement one another is the first step in forming a cohesive management team. Effective hiring is accomplished through a careful planning and implementation process that parallels the general turnaround effort. Write down job requirements before the hiring process begins. Solicit qualified candidates; throw out applications/resumes that are out of scope. Referrals from suppliers and customers tend to be the best sources of candidates. Objective measurement of qualifications against standards you have developed will shorten the list to be interviewed. Personal references and one-on-one assessments with the prospect’s proposed work team will verify compatibility.

Employee participation in the decision-making process is needed–more so during a turnaround. While key employees should be encouraged to contribute actively during meetings, they may not be asked to vote on issues affecting them directly. Meetings should also be an opportunity to thank employees for a job well done. Rewarding a manager for adherence to budget and schedule without also recognizing her team detracts from the team concept.

Reorganizing Staff

Reassigning personnel and restructuring responsibilities demands management team decision-making. Decisions about incentive and performance programs require outside assistance in so far as tax and legal consequences are concerned, but the ideas and proposals should come from management team meetings.

Management should not exclude themselves from the reassignment process! It may be that the president, for instance, is most valuable to the company in a different capacity or focus area. Like all staff members, she should be prepared (especially during a turnaround) to work in a role where strengths can be put to maximum use!