Tag Archives: Finance

Want Some Financing With That Seasonal Brew?

 

Jim Koch, who started the Boston Beer Co. in 1984, found that banks did not want to lend money to his or other start-ups. The inherent aversion to risk in the banker DNA means that they prefer to deal with businesses that have positive cash flows today rather than the promise of rosy returns in the future. Koch decided to start his own program, Brewing the American Dream, to help food, beverage, and hospitality entrepreneurs in the Boston area launch their businesses.

Koch comes form a long line of brew masters–six generations and counting–but is not what one may think of as a beer drinker with little training for running a company that features such a powerful brand as Sam Adams. With a bachelor’s degree, a law degree, and an MBA from Harvard, he has been groomed for this moment. He now wants to make sure that others get the right combination of instruction, mentoring, and capital to be successful in their own rights.

An article on businessweek.com last spring by Nick Leiber tells the story. Launched in 2008, the initiative aims to go beyond traditional corporate philanthropy to “leverage” Boston Beer employees’ expertise, “rather than just giving away money or time or beer,” says Koch. “I wish I could’ve had some loan money instead of having to raise equity, and I would’ve loved to have advice about the nuts and bolts of growing a business.”

Now the program, Brewing the American Dream, which has advised nearly 3,000 business owners and financed more than $1 million in small loans for about 150 businesses, is going national. Boston Beer, the largest craft brewer in the U.S., plans to lend at least $1 million this year, hold monthly speed-coaching events in major cities across the country, and curate an online-networking and education site for participants. The coaching events, at which beer flows freely, are meant to be informal and are open to any business owner, not just loan recipients. 

Lieber continues on to write,

Koch isn’t seeking a financial return from Boston Beer’s investment in the program—a tiny fraction of the $157 million the company says it spent in 2011 on advertising, promotions, and selling expenses. “There is a huge amount of coaching, hand-holding, advice to get the repayment [rate] up to 95 percent,” says Koch. “I know from the economics of our program; you lose money on it. It has to be philanthropic.”

Supporting small businesses through donations to nonprofit lenders has been catching on among prominent companies, which have created programs such as Goldman Sachs’s (GS) 10,000 Small Businesses andStarbucks’s (SBUX) Create Jobs for USA. “But [Boston Beer’s] combination of employee engagement, capital resources, and mentoring feels new to me—and very much a response driven by what’s been happening in the economy in the U.S. over the last several years,” says Harman. “It was a right time in the economy because lending had all but come to a halt and small businesses were really struggling.”

Notice the elements that are mentioned as hallmarks and critical success factors of the program.

  • Access to capital at reasonable rates
  • Coaching/mentoring
  • Networking

Every entrepreneur would benefit from this favorable combination. Unfortunately, many incubators and accelerators make capital expensive by taking an equity position in the companies they “help.” Non-profit organizations established to provide the coaching and mentoring often put a cap on the number of hours an entrepreneur can access assistance. The networking component is equally important. Instead of events where the beer flows and superficial conversations seldom lead to business plan execution, what is needed is more one-on-one opportunities. When start-up companies are housed in settings where the participants can pass one another in the halls, serve as peer counsel, and make key introductions for one another, success is far more likely.

 

Need Outside Investors? Choose Wisely

Is private equity in your future? Many closely held businesses reach a point where their capital structure is not supportive of their cash and other financing needs.  When internal resources and bank money is no longer enough, the business owner and/or CFO has to find outside sources. Seeking outside investment is not, however, an easy process. The search needs to resemble a courting relationship that used to be so common in interpersonal relationships. You are, after all, seeking to build a long-term partnership.

Inc. online has a column entitled Herding Gazelles. In a post today, Karl Stark & Bill Stewart point out what to look for in private equity investors:

1. Find the right investor.

Angel investors, venture capital funds and large corporations all have different investment profiles. Each has a specific motivation and a process they typically use to create value.  Partnering with the wrong investor often means that your business will be asked to meet investor goals that may not align with your goals for the business. Find an investor whose objectives are in sync with the business you are building. 

2. Agree to a common view on how to maximize value.

At the outset of your partnership, spend time to align on the facts around the business and its markets, then discuss your strategy and how it will maximize value for the business.   Make sure both parties are clear on the roles they will play and the expectations for how the investors will participate and add value to the business. A successful relationship is all about setting and communicating the right expectations and engaging in open communication when events necessitate a change in those expectations.

3. Align on the right incentives and desired outcomes for both parties.

Clearly lay out the personal, professional, and financial goals for both you and your investor. Identify areas where you can work together to help each other reach his or her individual goals. The investor will likely have a specific timeline in mind for an exit and may have expectations about an exit price. This will have a large impact on their view of various strategic decisions. As a CEO and management team, you may also have specific expectations about how to grow the business. Put these all on the table, especially if they may be in conflict, so you can manage expectations upfront and amicably.

4. Leverage your investor’s experience, not just their money.

Brainstorm with your investor about ways in which he or she might help push the business forward. In some instances this may be obvious, such as a partnership with a corporate entity, but you may be surprised at other things the investor can offer beyond financial support. Investors typically have seen successes and failures and can share their advice.  They may have a wealth of contacts, even potential customer relationships, that could provide value to the business. Don’t overlook these intangibles.

A private equity investor will be a key member of your management team, so you need to build a strong, lasting relationship with them-just as you would with any of your key team members. Using your investor to the fullest will be critical to fueling the growth of your business.

Following these guidelines is just good common sense. We would add to the suggestions that it is important to identify “fit” before anything is on the line. Discussing how decisions will be made, what outside professional services firms will be used, and how the composition of boards of directors and advisors ahead of time is a good way to learn about the investor’s priorities and values. While agreeing on how to maximize value is important, it is even more important to identify what metrics represent value.  Great advice on leveraging an investor’s experience–ask what they plan to bring to the partnership beyond money. You may be very pleasantly surprised!

 

Business Plan Primer

 

Not all business plans are the same; the type plan that is needed in start-up mode should be quite different than what would be used in a later stage. Early stage businesses should document milestones the team plans to accomplish, with mini-plans for describing how the milestones will be accomplished. Mature businesses have the luxury of using broader brush strokes to describe processes, personnel, and performance metrics. Regardless the stage, plans are required by lenders or investors to whet their appetites.

Dave Lavinsky, in a recent newsletter article  for GrowThink entitled The Ammunition Every Business Needs, writes:

When you think about it, this is really intuitive. Here’s why. Business plans are read by investors and lenders for risk management reasons. These money sources realize they are taking a risk with every check they write, and want to mitigate this risk. The business plan explains to them how the business will use their funding, and paints a picture as to the likelihood that they will get an adequate return on investment.

For mature businesses, the business plan is just one of severable variables the investor or lender can assess in their decision-making. For example, if you have a mature company, the investor or lender can speak to your customers, analyze your financial history, assess your team members’ backgrounds, compare your product to competitive offerings, and so on. As a result, if your business plan is weak but the other factors are really strong, your mature company may still receive funding.

On the other hand, for a new company, particularly one that doesn’t yet have revenues, the quality of your business plan is critical; because it is one of very few variables that the investor or lender can review. The investor or lender can consider your business plan, the bios or you and your team, and maybe a product or service prototype if you have one. That’s pretty much it.

General tips Lavinsky recommends for business plans include:

1. Always remember that your business plan is a marketing document

2. Write with confidence, but be careful of superlatives

3. Answer the key questions, but not all the questions

It is up to you, through the power of your written words, to be winsome. Convincing. Persuasive. You are trying to demonstrate that what you are offering addresses a real problem with a viable solution that your organization can provide in a uniquely satisfying way.

Succinctly discuss your process, document the metrics you plan to use to measure success, and share how your team has experience in performing the responsibilities  required to execute the plan. Don’t use ambiguous phrases that make it sound like you are inexperienced. Overstating your hand, however, by using words like “most,” best,” etc will only undermine your credibility.

Make sure you demonstrate your knowledge of  the competitive environment and a winning strategy to secure target market share. Write about your customer profile and how your offering will be appealing. Discuss marketplace trends and how they impact the strategy you are pursuing. Finally, tell the reader how the money you seek will be used, when, and why.

 

Watch Your Burn, Then Take Off!

When entrepreneurs start businesses, one of the last things they want to think about is running out of money. Whether the money is one’s own, that derived from friends and family, angel investors, or the bank, it has to be managed so that cash outflows are balanced by reserves and inflows. The term “Burn rate” is used commonly to describe  negative cash flow in a start-up. It indicates the speed of depletion of invested capital form shareholders. Once the cash reserves are used up, the company will either have to start making a profit, find additional funding, or close down. Venture Capitalists (VCs) are obviously very concerned about burn rates because they don’t want to see their investments wasted.

[Tom Tunguz, of Redpoint Ventures, in his blog, Ex Post Facto, writes the following:]

How does a VC think about your burn rate? First, it’s important to note that every company is different. Second, geography is an important factor. Third, pure consumer companies’ finances will differ dramatically from  e-commerce or SaaS companies. Given all those caveats, I’ve made a table of the rough figures that I expect to see in a company of various stages, immediately after financing.

When I make an investment, my aim is to fund the company to a milestone that enables the company to raise a subsequent round. Such a milestone tends to be achievable in 12 to 14 months. But a startup should raise 18 to 24 months’ capital to ensure some flexibility in case things don’t go according to plan.

A good rule of thumb in Silicon Valley is that every employee costs about $10k per month. By that estimate, a company of 20 people burns $200k for staff plus 25% for overhead, or $250k per month/$3M per year. This is on the richer side of burn rate calculations but given the rate of increase in engineering salaries recently, it may be closer to the norm.

For revenue generating companies, net burn (revenue – expenses) should be kept under $400k – $500k. A company burning more without the immediate prospect of revenue can be a concern because of how quickly these high burn rates reduce runway. Additionally, the company should aim to reach cash flow break even sometime after the Series B, before a Growth round. Again, every company is different, these guidelines are the mental model I’ve built of typical companies who have pitched us and worked with us.

Granted, Silicon Valley is more expensive than many other locales. Similarly, labor rates/salaries that drive the burn rate math are higher than in other regions. Even still, Tunguz makes a good point about the need to raise about 50% more than one expects will be required in terms of time to reach milestones. The “runway” referred to is the total amount of time before the venture crashes and burns due to lack of cash. As your company grows from solopreneur to employing 5+ people, these guidelines should come in handy to successfully manage the enterprise and its valuable cash.

American Restaurants Struggle to Stay Alive

Back in the late 1980s, the Turnaround Management Association was birthed out of a research project conducted at the Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. As the lead researcher, I had the opportunity to personally pull together a bibliography of articles about businesses whose travails were significant enough to hit the national headlines in various business publications. From the research, we published a monograph and wrote articles about best practices that appeared in 46 national business periodicals in our first 18 months of existence as a trade association. As I and other involved with the Association moved on to other pursuits, TMA moved off campus, starting gaining momentum in chapter development, and now enjoys international members as well as domestic. One of the publications of TMA is the Journal of Corporate Renewal. The Journal‘s lead article for May discusses the struggle of restaurants in the United States to remain profitable.

Some interesting facts from the National Restaurant Association are cited:

  • Restaurants account for 4% of GDP
  • 10% of the U.S. workforce is employed in the restaurant industry
  • 50% of adults have worked in a restaurant
  • one-third of all workers had their first job in a restaurant
  • 48% of the average household’s food budget goes to restaurants (vs. 25% fifty years ago)

The bankruptcy filings of a number of restaurant chains since the recession began in 2008 is but one indicator of a model that is teetering on the brink of survival. The photo above is taken from a Food Network show entitled Restaurant Impossible, wherein Robert Irvine turns a restaurant around in 48 hours. The menu is revised, customer service issues are addressed, $10,000 of strategic remodeling is performed, the revenue and costs are examined for opportunity, and the restaurant owner is challenged to run the business at a profit going forward.

Macro trends in the recent few years towards buying more groceries or becoming value-conscious have definitely affected the top and bottom lines of many restaurant owners. Franchises, which account for about half of the restaurant revenues produced nationwide, have really taken it on the chin. Franchisees who own one or only a few stores have inadequate access to capital these days. Another big factor is the conflict of interest in most franchise agreements that are based on sales volume. The franchisor can implement discounting programs to increase traffic and sales volume, but the franchisee has less and less profit as a result of the agreements.

What can be done? Turnaround experts recommend a process of performing store-level profitability analysis, followed by benchmarking against peer stores. These analyses can highlight purchasing/inventory issues, training issues that are evidenced by waste, and theft/shrinkage that depletes the operator’s assets needed to produce a return.

There are many good consultants who can help a restaurant owner sort through the challenges and create a plan for growth and renewal.