What Entrepreneurs Should NOT Do

When entrepreneurs start businesses, they are susceptible to making mistakes that others have made before them, climbing an unnecessarily steep learning curve, and burning through dollars and emotional energy. Without the help of an experienced mentor and some principles of start-up management, it is no wonder that many start-ups are not in existence 5 years later. Yes–success stories abound–mainly because few want to read or write about businesses that didn’t make it!

David Bakke is a writer for Money Crashers, and was featured on Brazen Life, a Brazen Careerist site recently with the list below of mistakes an entrepreneur should seek to avoid (& can with mentoring and education): http://ow.ly/ataho

1. Starting a business in a new field

Trying to launch a business in an industry or area where you don’t have any prior experience can quickly lead to failure. Before you make the leap into starting a business, make sure you focus on your talents, passion and experience to pinpoint the right business for you. Combine your enthusiasm, experience and knowledge with a solid, organized business plan if you really want to succeed.

2. Trying to start your business on your own

Trying to go it alone will only hamper your efforts to grow and expand your business. Initially it makes sense to cut costs by working alone, but soon enough you’ll need to make intelligent, calculated decisions about working with like-minded individuals to help your business grow.

3. Not adapting to changing business conditions

Learn to adapt as you grow your business. Don’t be afraid to change your target market or scrap unsatisfactory marketing initiatives. Recognize the fluidity of your small business, focus on what positively and negatively affects your business plan, and adjust your growth model accordingly.

4. Being deathly afraid of making mistakes

You engage in a great deal of risk when you launch a small business, and most of it involves your personal finances. Learn to quickly identify errors in judgment, determine why they occurred, and make immediate adjustments so they don’t happen again.

5. Avoiding risk

Continue to take risks as your business evolves. If you encounter an idea to expand your business that feels “risky,” research the pros and cons of the concept. If the idea still seems viable after your analysis, go for it!

6. Quitting if you run out of cash

No successful entrepreneur ever let money stand in the way of achieving business goals. If you have a great business plan, a passion for the concept, and you’re willing to work hard, you can always find ways to fund your business proposition. Cut costs in your everyday life to free up capital, apply for an SBA loan, approach angel investors, or even approach friends and family after you’ve bootstrapped as much as you can.

If you can’t find funding, you don’t have to give up on the business idea altogether. Timing also plays a role in business success. It might make sense to start more slowly, and to put off aggressive expansion efforts and attempts to find additional funding until your business begins to show a steady profit.

http://www.Entredot.org is one approach to what entrepreneurs SHOULD do–come check it out!

 

Successful Business Plans: 5 More Keys


EntreDot Executive Director Bill Warner wrote a blog post this week for the Raleigh Emerging Designers Innovation Incubator website about business plans. In it, he shares keys to success.  Yesterday’s post here dealt with 5 keys; 5 more are offered below:

“Have a compelling value proposition.”

  • Solve a truly important problem with an attractive return on investment.
  • Make sure it fits into your buyer’s priorities.

The Challenge: You must fit within your buyer’s priority list for planned purchases. The benefit of your product has to be at the forefront of your customer’s needs. The best way to express the value of your product or service is to present a return on investment (ROI) analysis. You should be providing either higher revenue or lower cost/expense, and it should take less than a year to pay the investment back. Anything else is probably a “nice to have,” and is unlikely to win in a market where buyers are only purchasing “must have” solutions.

“Have a targeted marketing plan.”

  • Know how to reach your buyer to gain awareness
  • Establish a cost effective lead generation plan

The Challenge: Select the right way to deliver your message to your potential buyer: advertising, trade articles, mail or email campaigns, telemarketing, distributors, value added remarkets, dealers or direct sales force. Many companies are over-reliant on franchises as offering a silver bullet strategy for support and getting started. They don’t sufficiently analyze what the franchiser brings to the table that you can’t do for yourself. Franchisees sometimes over-estimate the value of the support from the franchiser; in that, is it worth the franchising fee and the royalty payment? Can those costs be made up by efficiencies offered by the franchiser? Can those costs be passed on to your customer? If not, the franchisee is at a competitive disadvantage. Those with a “brand” that can bring customers in the door on “day one” and provide active business operation assistance, rather than arms length promises, are particularly worth looking into. Once you have generated qualified leads, manage them through the entire sales process.

“Create the most efficient sales channel and excellent customer support.”

  • Ensure the sales approach is affordable
  • Build satisfied customers

The Challenge: Establish a sales forecast. Hoping for sales is not planning. Sales forecasts are based on understanding the buyer in your selected market segment and on the experience of others in it. Many new companies underestimate the time it takes to build a business to the point where it is profitable. As a result, many new businesses are under-financed and have insufficient working capital to sustain themselves in the initial growth period or during seasonal downturns. Being new and small is no excuse for cutting corners in dealing with customers. Would you go into a shop in the mall with cheap looking furnishings and lighting? Don’t try to save money there. Your sales and support efforts should be guided to create a satisfied customer who is willing to be a reference to other potential customers and give you repeat business as well.

“Understand your entire financial model.”

  • Establish realistic sales, cost, capital and expense plans
  • Understand cash flow and profit dynamics

The Challenge: Establish a solid financial plan. Many new companies are unplanned or under-planned. Planning cannot deal with all the surprises in the real world, but why be surprised by things you can anticipate and deal with beforehand? Planning requires a highly detailed and kinetic vision of the future of the business that reduces that vision to the language of business, dollars and cents. A financial plan is required to raise money from banks and investors in addition to helping you set financial objectives. Many new companies try to save money by avoiding the costs of lawyers, accountants and insurance agents. One mistake can cost you many times the small cost of relying on experts. Operationally, the most important financial dynamic to understand is cash flow. Know how money comes into and goes out of your company and when the transactions occur. The penalty for not managing your financials well is running out of money and probably losing your business.

“Ensure you have a winning team.”

  • They should have the passion for success
  • Attract the best experience and know-how

The Challenge: Pick the best people for your company. Many new businesses reach too far in a single step; for example, starting a trucking business without any prior experience. Take it “step-by-step”. Often the first step is to get a job in a business similar to the one you want to start. Learn the business from the inside out. Then start your own business.  With the right experience under your belt, build your team with people that fill out the strengths that you need to run your business. Pick only the best people that can get the job done. Avoid hiring friends and family.

Reverse the Mentoring Stereotype

In its most common context, mentoring is understood as someone with experience (and a few grey hairs!) showing someone younger how to perform key job functions. Yet, one of the hottest trends in human resources is termed “reverse mentoring.” Whether due to job loss and the need for new training, or “Second Act” entrepreneurship, or simply the precipitous amount of change being introduced in organizations trying to compete globally, there has arisen a need for this practice where younger workers are now showing the older ones “the ropes.”

While the concept is that exposure to those outside the corporate suite may be good for staying in touch with the values held by newer workers, there are several other benefits. Higher employee retention rates among younger workers are cited as an unexpected, but welcome outcome. Exposure to management issues and how decisions are made are additional upsides.

When Jack Welch was the CEO of General Electric, he  was mentored on how to use the internet by a young employee in her 20s. He saw such promise from the process that he mandated that 500 of his top executives reach out to younger employees to do likewise. These days, mentees are learning how to use social media effectively from their younger mentors. Even at top ad agencies like Ogilvy & Mather, a worldwide managing director admitted that his more youthful mentors had shown him how to enhance his Twitter posts to be less boring. His eyes have been opened to new possibilities and he now plans to utilize Skype and videoconferencing to facilitate distance mentoring across the firm’s 450 offices. HP & Cisco also have reverse mentoring programs in place.

Michelle Rafter, in a blog post entitled “8 Ways to Make a Reverse Mentorship Work For You,” suggests the following guidelines:

1. Find a compatible partner –someone with skills in areas you’re lacking

2. Set expectations- create ground rules for what you want out of a partnership, such as how often you’ll meet and what both parties will get out of it

3. Get your boss’s OK- A lot of reciprocal mentoring can happen on an informal basis. But if you want or need to set up a formal program, you’ll need your manager’s or company’s approval.

4. Be open to suggestions and criticism- learn in days from someone else what one could take decades otherwise by having a thick skin

5. Make it more than just about tech- maybe a younger person could help you learn about sushi, Chinese, popular music, or even how to lead the next generation more effectively

6. Give as much as you get-the relationship should be mutually beneficial

7. Experiment with approaches– a single department, a program that crosses departments, and a multitude of variations

8. Don’t stereotype- not every 45-year-old has the same knowledge or expertise, so don’t assume every Gen Y worker does, either.

Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is

Do your customers feel like you have “skin in the game?” Many times the answer to that question is not an affirmative one. Professionals who bill by the hour or some other common fee arrangement are perceived by their clients as making money whether the clients do or not. Ad agencies, law, CPA, architecture, engineering, consulting and advisory firms all face this uphill battle to demonstrate their understanding of the client’s economic model while simultaneously delivering a service of their own at an acceptable profit margin.

Take the advertising world as an example. The old model was charging clients a percentage of the paid advertising spend. When clients pushed back against the pricing model as a disincentive to do necessary promotion, some agency execs switched to an hourly billing model. There was a disconnect under this model in terms of quality and outcomes. Jaynie L. Smith describes the migration to a new model by Andy Berlin, co-CEO of WPP agency Red Cell this way:

     He stunned advertisers and agencies alike at (a) management conference of the American Association of Advertising Agencies by suggesting a radical change in the way advertising is priced. It boils down to pay for performance: The better the ads do for the buyer, the more the agency gets paid.

     When you stake your claim on your own ability to come through for the client, you and your firm take a calculated risk. Doing so will transform your service delivery model. No longer will “good enough” be acceptable when the client’s success is the focus. By making the client successful, your firm becomes successful as well. Getting your people to make the cultural shift to this paradigm will require strong leadership, courage, and perseverance.

You carve out an enduring competitive advantage when you are bold enough to depart from the strategy of the category killers and pursue client focus and concern. Differentiation on your own terms rather than price or something that undermines rather than builds up your company’s financial position is good business!

To have “skin in the game” means to have greater commitment than anyone else. Show your commitment to your clients by going above and beyond the call. By letting them know that you won’t get paid unless they receive what they seek, you have told the clients that you have their backs–that you are watching out for what’s best for them. That is unique and sustainable and gives you the ability to win people over with whom you would like to do business.

Legal Marketing Stats–How Do you Compare?

In surveys by organizations serving the law firm industry, one of the areas studied is marketing activities and spending.

Utilization of Marketing Tactics

Historically proven marketing tactics (yellow pages, legal listings, and client entertainment) are giving way to more focus on Internet-based strategies (Web sites, Search Engine Optimization [SEO],  paid search advertising, blogs, and newer forms of social media) to grow their practice. Firm size drives decisions as to what degree various marketing tactics are utilized. Smaller firms are most likely to use yellow pages and legal listings, but larger firms are more likely to rely on client entertainment. However, while client entertainment is still the leading choice among firms with 11-20 attorneys, it has been dropping off as a primary tactic. Web sites remain the preferred means of marketing over a multi-year period.

Significance of Internet Marketing

Law firms continue to use the Internet to promote their practice, and are using the latest techniques to attract potential clients. Search engine optimization increased throughout the period of 2005-2010. Additionally, more firms began using online legal sites to attract clients. Blog use soared during the same time period. This reveals a latent desire to explore new methods in addition to traditional tactics to attract potential clients.

Perceived Value of Marketing Tactics

Networking and word-of-mouth continue to be integral to building a law practice; however, online activities are also prevalent in integrated marketing campaigns. Web sites and related tactics are considered a primary marketing tool for growing a firm’s practice, and more money is allocated towards this tactic than ever before. Though blogs have been on the rise in efforts to develop clients, it should be noted that very little revenue is allocated towards this activity (1%).
While face-to-face interaction with potential clients is still important, client entertainment is decreasing in its value to attract potential clients, and less money is being allocated towards it than five to ten years ago.
Who Does the Marketing?
Solo practitioners increasingly use outside consultants and administrative staff members (office managers, assistants and secretaries). Mid-size firms (2-5 attorneys) have also increased their reliance on administrative staff members.
Larger firms (6+ attorneys) rely less on marketing consultants and more on other staff members, including marketing managers and related positions.
How Big is the Marketing Budget?
In relation to firm revenues, about one firm in four spends less than 1% on marketing activities. Interestingly:
  • More firms with 11-20 attorneys skimp on marketing than solo practitioners and smaller practices.
  • 39% of solo practices spend over 5%
  • 27% of practices with 2-5 attorneys spend over 5%
What does all this information mean to you as an attorney? I suggest the following:
  1. When small, spend bigger (%-wise)
  2. As you grow, curtail the spending (by %), but spend more wisely
  3. Look for Internet-based marketing strategies to fuel your growth
  4. Decrease your reliance on (but don’t do away with) client events
  5. Explore blogging and social media–either through in-house or contract resources