Tag Archives: metrics

Avoid 5 Positioning Mistakes

When a company is trying to get off the ground, it is critical to send the right message to the right audience in the right way at the right time. However, entrepreneurs with fantastic products or services often ruin their chances at making the sale, securing the revenues, and building credibility by being inexact in how they position their offering.

Admittedly, it is challenging to create and refine a value proposition when there are so many other demands on your time.  Frequently, entrepreneurs work on concept, design, and other technical details without giving earnest heed to the value of top-notch marketing. Is this because marketing is seen as a discretionary expense? Is it because the typical entrepreneur has bought into the “build it and they will come” idea? For whatever reason, the decisions regarding market penetration strategy are poorly executed and offerings positioned poorly more often than not. If you’ve never applied the premise that “you never get a second chance to make a first impression” to business, do so now! Your company’s success depends upon it!

Start by determining within your team what success will look like and how it will be measured. Take time to ferret out what, exactly, you are offering, how it solves a unique problem, and how your approach to the market is both unique and appealing. Once you have ironed out some of these influential factors, take the time to think about your intended target and the nuances of explaining your offering in such a way that you “rise above the noise” of distraction and become intriguing to them.

Don’t make any of the 5 mistakes below when launching your business. Not surprisingly, targeted investors, employees, and customers often evaluate you before they commit.  You can enhance the chance that you will earn the commitment you deserve if you follow the advice of David Scholtze of Ariadne Capital. Writing in Entrepreneur Country a couple of months ago, he described “The 5 typical problems I keep seeing in misaligned propositions”:

1) Thinking big and forgetting the baby steps that get you there

The real market opportunity is won one sale at a time are you constantly refining your sale or slapping it out there? Go-to-market is about aligning your achievable market to your vision, are you building credibility?

2) Spread too broad and lack focus

Fix-all solutions are hard to buy or too good to be true, is your proposition tight? Tight propositions mean new services can develop in parallel, are you giving too much away in solving too much?

3) Forget that your audience don’t know your product

Even high tech can be simplified beyond technology into enablement, can your mother understand the proposition? Don’t assume your market knows the problem like you do, are you selling from a common starting point?

4) Defining the proposition as a nice to have not a solution

Too much emphasis is put on the extra benefits, are you selling lots of benefits or a solution to a specific problem? People feel the need to over validate with external information, are you forgetting the original “spark” that led to the solution and how you solve the problem?

5) Don’t align the message to the solution

Proposition pitches try to be catch all and complex people buy simple, are you selling a solution or a service? People are looking to solve a problem, does your product proposition enable champions and evangelists?

Once you understand, plan for and execute along these principles, you can create a strong market position.  This means you can challenge your sales team, empower your marketers and “wow” your investors. Only good things can happen from there…

 

NC Entrepreneurship On the Move

One of the best sources of information on entrepreneurship is the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. The Kauffman Index of Entrepreneurial Activity looks at demographic trends in start-up activity over a 15 year time period.

Key findings last year:

Age Groups:

Growth was highest among 45- to 54-year-olds, rising from 0.35 percent in 2010 to 0.37 percent in 2011. The youngest group (aged 20 to 34) also showed a slight increase. In contrast, the 35- to 44-year-old and 55- to 64-year-old groups experienced declines in entrepreneurial activity rates from 2010 to 2011. Contrastingly, the share of new 55- to 64-year-old entrepreneurs has risen from 14.3 percent in 1996 to 20.9 percent in 2011 due to an aging U.S. population.

Ethnic Groups:

The Latino share of all new entrepreneurs rose from a little more than 10 percent in 1996 to 22.9 percent in 2011, reflecting longer-term trends of rising entrepreneurship rates and a growing share of the U.S. population. The Asian share of new entrepreneurs also rose substantially from 1996 to 2011, but remains relatively small at 5.3 percent. The white share of new entrepreneurs declined during this time period, while the African American share increased slightly. Both immigrant and native-born entrepreneurial activity declined slightly in 2011; however, immigrants remained more than twice as likely to start new businesses as were the native-born.

Industry Groups:

By industry, construction had the highest entrepreneurial activity rate at 1.68 percent, continuing an upward trend over the past several years, followed by the services industry at 0.42 percent. The manufacturing startup rate was the lowest among all industries, with only 0.11 percent of non-business owners starting businesses per month during 2011.

In North Carolina, while we don’t have pinpoint data to break down the Kauffman numbers on a local basis, we can extrapolate their impact on our entrepreneurial scene. We should anticipate more 45-54 year olds to start businesses, a greater demand among non-Caucasians, and a rebound of construction start-ups to complement the steady flow of services businesses.

The Huffington Post reported last week that North Carolina is one of the top 10 states for startup hiring in 2011, based on the growth in the total number of jobs at start-ups. While there is definitely start-up activity in all regions of the state, outside of North Carolina the start-up scene around the Research Triangle Park area is best known. It seems all of the Triangle research universities are wanting to champion entrepreneurship and its healthy impact on the state and local economy. Duke University recently completed another Startup Challenge. NC State University hosted the Lulu Games competition as a part of its Entrepreneurship Initiative.

Over at UNC, in a massive research project conducted at the Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise, Ted Zoller highlighted the role of the dealmaker in assisting entrepreneurial ventures to reach their funding milestones. While the person who matches the entrepreneur with the funding source is critical for many life science and high technology ventures, not all start-ups are so capital intensive. What is a common need among businesses of all types is mentoring. Whether one is using something similar to the programs developed at MIT or a localized version, mentoring–coupled with community and education–is critical to successful business launches.

Bureaucracy: The Entrepreneur’s Kryptonite

As Dan Sullivan says in The Strategic Coach® Program, “The human brain cannot do extraordinary things, only normal things.” “So the trick,” he says, “is to make the extraordinary normal.”

Corporate employees operate based on policy: that’s what keeps them from having to think. Entrepreneurs depend thrive on having the freedom to constantly grow and change, to make new connections, and to ask questions that shake everything up. To an entrepreneur, groupthink (i.e. bureaucracy) is like Kryptonite.

Just because we don’t like being bogged down by over reliance on structure doesn’t mean that we are always creative. Following established patterns and trying to approach every issue with the same solution is a bad habit even for an entrepreneur. Rather than seeing opportunity, we can become fixated on solving a problem.

When Jim Collins wrote about Big Hairy Audacious Goals (“BHAGs”), he was challenging small thinking. Simply considering an aggressive goal causes the mind to see the environment differently. Unable to stop thinking about the “What ifs,” we are empowered to consider new concepts,  linkage and alternative ways of viewing the same issue. Divergent thinking is modeled by the likes of Richard Branson, who tweeted, “My interest in life comes from setting myself huge, apparently unachievable challenges, and trying to rise above them.”

Your definition of “normal” daily experience becomes unique when you think in terms of BHAGs.  Dream for a moment about what life could look like in 5-7 years. Can you imagine performing at 10x today’s level? Earning 10X what you do today?

Bureaucracies are based on keeping everything the same so they can preserve their status. Policy and rules “protect” the structure from the effects of individuals, whose participation is measured in hours on the clock, not in results. In an entrepreneurial organization, by contrast, change is life, because “holding your ground” means stagnating and falling behind. Individuals are sought out and rewarded for their ability to think, create, and make a unique contribution.

Make a habit of  what Sullivan terms the “10x Mindset,” and innovation, risk-taking, and teamwork will all come together for you in a completely new way. Bureaucratic thinking and structures simply won’t survive in your environment because you and the people around you will be entirely focused on building, adapting, and expanding a path toward your “bigger future” vision.

Cultivate a creative mindset that makes growth and progress “normal.”

Successful Business Plans: 5 More Keys


EntreDot Executive Director Bill Warner wrote a blog post this week for the Raleigh Emerging Designers Innovation Incubator website about business plans. In it, he shares keys to success.  Yesterday’s post here dealt with 5 keys; 5 more are offered below:

“Have a compelling value proposition.”

  • Solve a truly important problem with an attractive return on investment.
  • Make sure it fits into your buyer’s priorities.

The Challenge: You must fit within your buyer’s priority list for planned purchases. The benefit of your product has to be at the forefront of your customer’s needs. The best way to express the value of your product or service is to present a return on investment (ROI) analysis. You should be providing either higher revenue or lower cost/expense, and it should take less than a year to pay the investment back. Anything else is probably a “nice to have,” and is unlikely to win in a market where buyers are only purchasing “must have” solutions.

“Have a targeted marketing plan.”

  • Know how to reach your buyer to gain awareness
  • Establish a cost effective lead generation plan

The Challenge: Select the right way to deliver your message to your potential buyer: advertising, trade articles, mail or email campaigns, telemarketing, distributors, value added remarkets, dealers or direct sales force. Many companies are over-reliant on franchises as offering a silver bullet strategy for support and getting started. They don’t sufficiently analyze what the franchiser brings to the table that you can’t do for yourself. Franchisees sometimes over-estimate the value of the support from the franchiser; in that, is it worth the franchising fee and the royalty payment? Can those costs be made up by efficiencies offered by the franchiser? Can those costs be passed on to your customer? If not, the franchisee is at a competitive disadvantage. Those with a “brand” that can bring customers in the door on “day one” and provide active business operation assistance, rather than arms length promises, are particularly worth looking into. Once you have generated qualified leads, manage them through the entire sales process.

“Create the most efficient sales channel and excellent customer support.”

  • Ensure the sales approach is affordable
  • Build satisfied customers

The Challenge: Establish a sales forecast. Hoping for sales is not planning. Sales forecasts are based on understanding the buyer in your selected market segment and on the experience of others in it. Many new companies underestimate the time it takes to build a business to the point where it is profitable. As a result, many new businesses are under-financed and have insufficient working capital to sustain themselves in the initial growth period or during seasonal downturns. Being new and small is no excuse for cutting corners in dealing with customers. Would you go into a shop in the mall with cheap looking furnishings and lighting? Don’t try to save money there. Your sales and support efforts should be guided to create a satisfied customer who is willing to be a reference to other potential customers and give you repeat business as well.

“Understand your entire financial model.”

  • Establish realistic sales, cost, capital and expense plans
  • Understand cash flow and profit dynamics

The Challenge: Establish a solid financial plan. Many new companies are unplanned or under-planned. Planning cannot deal with all the surprises in the real world, but why be surprised by things you can anticipate and deal with beforehand? Planning requires a highly detailed and kinetic vision of the future of the business that reduces that vision to the language of business, dollars and cents. A financial plan is required to raise money from banks and investors in addition to helping you set financial objectives. Many new companies try to save money by avoiding the costs of lawyers, accountants and insurance agents. One mistake can cost you many times the small cost of relying on experts. Operationally, the most important financial dynamic to understand is cash flow. Know how money comes into and goes out of your company and when the transactions occur. The penalty for not managing your financials well is running out of money and probably losing your business.

“Ensure you have a winning team.”

  • They should have the passion for success
  • Attract the best experience and know-how

The Challenge: Pick the best people for your company. Many new businesses reach too far in a single step; for example, starting a trucking business without any prior experience. Take it “step-by-step”. Often the first step is to get a job in a business similar to the one you want to start. Learn the business from the inside out. Then start your own business.  With the right experience under your belt, build your team with people that fill out the strengths that you need to run your business. Pick only the best people that can get the job done. Avoid hiring friends and family.

Legal Marketing Stats–How Do you Compare?

In surveys by organizations serving the law firm industry, one of the areas studied is marketing activities and spending.

Utilization of Marketing Tactics

Historically proven marketing tactics (yellow pages, legal listings, and client entertainment) are giving way to more focus on Internet-based strategies (Web sites, Search Engine Optimization [SEO],  paid search advertising, blogs, and newer forms of social media) to grow their practice. Firm size drives decisions as to what degree various marketing tactics are utilized. Smaller firms are most likely to use yellow pages and legal listings, but larger firms are more likely to rely on client entertainment. However, while client entertainment is still the leading choice among firms with 11-20 attorneys, it has been dropping off as a primary tactic. Web sites remain the preferred means of marketing over a multi-year period.

Significance of Internet Marketing

Law firms continue to use the Internet to promote their practice, and are using the latest techniques to attract potential clients. Search engine optimization increased throughout the period of 2005-2010. Additionally, more firms began using online legal sites to attract clients. Blog use soared during the same time period. This reveals a latent desire to explore new methods in addition to traditional tactics to attract potential clients.

Perceived Value of Marketing Tactics

Networking and word-of-mouth continue to be integral to building a law practice; however, online activities are also prevalent in integrated marketing campaigns. Web sites and related tactics are considered a primary marketing tool for growing a firm’s practice, and more money is allocated towards this tactic than ever before. Though blogs have been on the rise in efforts to develop clients, it should be noted that very little revenue is allocated towards this activity (1%).
While face-to-face interaction with potential clients is still important, client entertainment is decreasing in its value to attract potential clients, and less money is being allocated towards it than five to ten years ago.
Who Does the Marketing?
Solo practitioners increasingly use outside consultants and administrative staff members (office managers, assistants and secretaries). Mid-size firms (2-5 attorneys) have also increased their reliance on administrative staff members.
Larger firms (6+ attorneys) rely less on marketing consultants and more on other staff members, including marketing managers and related positions.
How Big is the Marketing Budget?
In relation to firm revenues, about one firm in four spends less than 1% on marketing activities. Interestingly:
  • More firms with 11-20 attorneys skimp on marketing than solo practitioners and smaller practices.
  • 39% of solo practices spend over 5%
  • 27% of practices with 2-5 attorneys spend over 5%
What does all this information mean to you as an attorney? I suggest the following:
  1. When small, spend bigger (%-wise)
  2. As you grow, curtail the spending (by %), but spend more wisely
  3. Look for Internet-based marketing strategies to fuel your growth
  4. Decrease your reliance on (but don’t do away with) client events
  5. Explore blogging and social media–either through in-house or contract resources