Tag Archives: OrgDev

Owner as Entrepreneur vs Manager: Jekyll and Hyde

At the center of every small business management team is the owner, whose primary long-term responsibility is to manage the company effectively. While some companies have several people who function in this capacity, this discussion will assume that an on-site entrepreneur/owner runs the business. Traditionally, this individual oversees the entire operation and personally looks over most company work, both in the office and in the field/plant. Furthermore, the owner is commonly a jack-of-all-trades, wearing the hats of many different employee roles.

The “Jekyll & Hyde” Theory

It is often asserted that the individual who single-handedly runs a company has a certain, identifiable “Jekyll and Hyde” personality. In demeanor and approach to problem-solving, the typical owner ranges from brilliant to tyrannical. An effective strategic plan must therefor encourage brilliance while keeping the owner away from problems that transform him or her into an ineffective manager. The same qualities that have enabled the owner to gain insight into many facets of the business operations are the exact ones that force him or her to be involved in every decision, major or minor. Such overt  care and concern for the company is to be anticipated and applauded. When it results in ineffective management, however, a remedy must be devised.

Entrepreneur or Manager?

Efficient businesses require in-house management. Unfortunately, the skills that make an owner a successful entrepreneur can be at odds with those that make one an effective manager. Excellent entrepreneurs have great sensitivity to market changes. However, when they leave the daily operations to become managers, two things happen: 1) they stop using their innate skills, and 2) they manage ineffectively.

Though the owner may experience periods of fear or apprehension, as a group owners are generally optimistic and opportunistic. Good owners emanate confidence, motivating those around them. For example, by spotting a mismatch between market demand and supply, a good one can inspire employees to work towards meeting that demand. Uniquely able among executive team members  to downplay the importance of minor setbacks, savvy owners emphasize the company’s forward movement in a vision casting mode.

Finally, first-hand knowledge of company history sets the owner apart. Having founded the company, the owner as entrepreneur is an indispensable part of the management team. When questions arise concerning company history or past performance, as they frequently do during times of tension, who better to turn to than the individual who has owned or managed the company all the while?

The Owner’s Vision

In providing vision for the company, the owner is expected to identify opportunities to pioneer new markets and expand the company’s presence in existing markets. Thorough identification of precise product offerings and internal procedures to make the products is a large part of every owner’s job description. The interaction between market research (including trends, buying patterns, and demand) and company vision is a relationship that the effective entrepreneur manages on a regular basis.

The entrepreneur can help the management team by maintaining personal relationships  with key parties such as sales people and lenders. If links have been formed based on good rapport with these parties, it is only fitting that these relationships continue  when they cannot be successfully turned over to another manager. This scenario rings particularly true with regard to negotiations with suppliers. The owner’s involvement in handling these parties is essential to reinforcing profitability.

 

Management Direction and the Turnaround

With the necessary financial and operational restructuring, plus the marketing re-positioning, it is easy to overlook a key factor that often proves to be critical to successful turnarounds: staff motivation. Reorganizing and involving not just the management team, but also the rank-and-file  are two essential tasks. The entire company must be pulling in the same direction to achieve optimal success. Involvement creates a “can-do” atmosphere that spreads to vendors, customers, and other stakeholders.

Involving Staff

It is imperative that appropriate changes be made to show that the executive team is committed to “doing whatever it takes.” Key employees should be encouraged to take an active role in the turnaround process, ensuring that they feel they are a vital part of the solution. Regularly scheduled management meetings are the new norm. In times of crisis, these meetings may need to occur daily; in profitable times biweekly should be adequate. Finding yourself and the team somewhere between crisis and optimization may be reason to vary the frequency of meetings, but they should never be more sporadic than once every two weeks.

Motivation

Do not be afraid to ask employees their opinions about what motivates them to perform. These opinions can be used to develop performance measurements and incentive plans. Scrutiny of company policy manuals and benefits offered can help identify ways to enhance engagement. Also, discovering the most frequently encountered problems can reveal how managers are applying–or failing to apply–useful solutions. Project descriptions, summaries of the company’s performance in adhering to budget and time constraints, and brainstorming time to recommend better methods are good synergy building activities.

Evaluation

Some companies like to administer tests of ability to prospective employees. Yet, once the prospects are hired, there is very little training and development. Close supervision should yield observations about areas for improvement. It is the responsibility of management to find ways to challenge employees to grow in their capabilities–both technical and soft skills–throughout their careers. Developing professional growth plans and holding folks accountable to execute them is good for all. Tying performance measurement to the plans shows employees that you are serious about continuous improvement and results-based management.

Teamwork

The team is also responsible for cultivating the management team concept in hiring employees, meeting goals and objectives, and conducting individual performance reviews. In addition, management’s performance should be reviewed to locate and remove any team members who are preventing goals and objectives from being met.

Hiring people who complement one another is the first step in forming a cohesive management team. Effective hiring is accomplished through a careful planning and implementation process that parallels the general turnaround effort. Write down job requirements before the hiring process begins. Solicit qualified candidates; throw out applications/resumes that are out of scope. Referrals from suppliers and customers tend to be the best sources of candidates. Objective measurement of qualifications against standards you have developed will shorten the list to be interviewed. Personal references and one-on-one assessments with the prospect’s proposed work team will verify compatibility.

Employee participation in the decision-making process is needed–more so during a turnaround. While key employees should be encouraged to contribute actively during meetings, they may not be asked to vote on issues affecting them directly. Meetings should also be an opportunity to thank employees for a job well done. Rewarding a manager for adherence to budget and schedule without also recognizing her team detracts from the team concept.

Reorganizing Staff

Reassigning personnel and restructuring responsibilities demands management team decision-making. Decisions about incentive and performance programs require outside assistance in so far as tax and legal consequences are concerned, but the ideas and proposals should come from management team meetings.

Management should not exclude themselves from the reassignment process! It may be that the president, for instance, is most valuable to the company in a different capacity or focus area. Like all staff members, she should be prepared (especially during a turnaround) to work in a role where strengths can be put to maximum use!

 

Management: Information, Structure, Mission & Goals

 

Thorough management information systems can also aid the company in gaining a competitive advantage. By monitoring job progress, collecting data about percent complete against target, a good system can help the organization adapt more quickly to changes in either the internal or external environment. In the financial area, a proper system can eliminate much busywork, thereby allowing office staff and managers to focus on priorities, such as customer service.

Therefore, management information systems should be designed to provide the meaningful financial and operating information necessary to plan a company’s direction. The costing, pricing, and scheduling systems produce information necessary to control expenses. Similarly, work schedules, purchasing systems (purchase orders or the equivalent), and supplier files establish the framework for orderly completion of work according to budget. An accurate reporting system is required to maintain financial controls. However, many of these systems take on characteristics over time that may not aid the company in achieving optimal efficiencies. Only through review and analysis of the documented assumptions behind the systems and the logic of the systems themselves can the executive team determine whether reporting can be improved.

An illustration of one area in which management information systems can shape corporate planning is in inventory listings for a manufacturing or retail company. Inventory classifiable as old or having low margins can be highlighted for increased marketing focus to increase sales turnover. As sales increase, interest carrying costs diminish. Carrying costs include the cost of capital, insurance, theft, obsolescence, repair, financing costs, maintenance, and loss of use of capital.

Management Structure and Characteristics

The structure of a company contributes to its strengths and weaknesses. In turn, the form of management, motivation techniques, and employee job skills dictate the structure of the company. If management and employees are not motivated to perform their jobs or lack the skills to do so, the entire business suffers. Every company must be based on three essential elements:

  • mission statement
  • goals 
  • objectives

Mission Statement

Many executives carry their company’s mission statement around in their heads but fail to share it with employees in a way that encourages them to share the enthusiasm and commitment. Committing the mission statement to writing in language understandable by all interested parties lays the groundwork for the joint development of company goals and objectives. This mission statement should explain the product, the operating focus, and the distinguishing characteristics of the company’s vision. The statement should remain valid for the life of the company.

Goals and Objectives

Goals that take shape through employee input usually result in shared dreams. If the goals, objectives, and tactics needed to accomplish the mission are agreed upon by all at the outset, they become a standard against which performance can be judged. An example of a goal would be to achieve 15 percent market share in the Gen Y demographic in a certain geography within five years. An objective would be to sell X number of units in one to three years. A tactic would be to sell X number of units in a given channel in a given price range by a certain date within one year.

A review of organizational charts reveals much about the work flow in a given operation. The actual flow of work needs to be compared against planned work flow and adjusted periodically to achieve efficiency. In addition, job descriptions need to reflect reality and effectiveness. Employees should be asked to write both what they have been hired to do and, additionally, what they actually do. After receiving the employee descriptions, the executive team can draft job descriptions that promote effective work completion.

 

Crafting a Turnaround Plan

The turnaround plan for a company in decline is like a recipe to a cook. The effective restructuring of a business requires the preparation and implementation of a viable plan. The plan must be based information gathered from financial, operating and marketing sources. Good plans must also address cost containment and revenue enhancement, providing the executive team with a step-by-step process for reversing decline and stabilizing the business. It must also lead to orderly growth promoted through a flexible strategic plan.

In turnaround planning, objectives are created that can be accomplished quickly. Therefore, a turnaround plan should be direct, with a limited life not to exceed one year. Teams should initiate tactics (for example, increasing traffic to one’s website) on a weekly basis, then shift to biweekly and monthly to keep pace with the rate of change within the business. When objectives must be accomplished over a longer time span, it is time to prepare a flexible strategic plan.

The Purpose of a Turnaround Plan

The purpose of a turnaround plan is to provide an organizational focus and a timetable for all recovery activities. For example, measurable performance standards must be enforced. Therefore, key personnel should set objectives before the actual plan is drafted to encourage employees to commit to levels of performance that they believe are attainable. The team management approach will generate the ideal environment for enforcing the mandates of the plan, since every key employee will have been involved in its formulation and implementation.

Time and Money

Because turnarounds are time and dollar critical, the team should stick to the originally drafted plan as long as its underlying assumptions remain valid. When the parameters upon which the plan has been based change, it is time to modify all portions of the plan affected. However, the team should not abandon the plan upon first confrontation with undesirable results.

Outside Parties

To satisfy outside parties interested in the cause for company decline and the solutions underway to reverse it, the plan typically contains a brief section describing the background and historical evolution of the company. Additionally, some discussion of prior operating performance and an objective assessment of the current condition can help the team highlight the events that have caused the problems. Management should then state the problems that caused the decline and follow up with the solutions that have been implemented to address it. Sections on the vision and philosophy of the company are unnecessary, though some do outline the thought process that led to current strategies and goals. However, these thoughts may be more appropriate in a flexible strategic plan, since a turnaround plan is action oriented.

Reaching Ground Zero

In environments in which the business has always made money (and may still be making marginal, though unsatisfactory, returns), it may be difficult to deal with declining profitability. Reading financial reports that signal what may be the first downturn the company has suffered is not sufficient preparation for the struggles to come.  Some find it difficult to believe that what they are reading is accurate. The impulse to ignore the signals and hope that the situation improves can be overwhelming. At some point, however, the team must deal with the facts and acknowledge that money is being lost–either as a net loss or as a smaller return–and that radical change is needed.

Being brutally honest and objective about the status of the business is hard. But, if “ground zero” is never reached, recovery cannot begin in earnest.

Turning Around a Company Not in Trouble

Someone once asked John Whitney of Columbia Business School the question, “how do you turn around a company that isn’t in trouble?” John’s reply was classic–

“it is in trouble—it just isn’t in crisis yet. The idea is to avoid a crisis by changing the policies and procedures in the company so it can really compete globally, compete for the long term.”

John went on to say that waiting until a company is in trouble to fix it is management by exception. Over 20 years ago (before globalization and a worldwide economy became the hot topic it is today) Mr. Whitney observed that competition abroad to continuously improve would force companies domestically to keep focused on “management by review.“

Companies that have enjoyed success, however, can be reluctant to undertake change through what is termed an operational turnaround. It can be harder, though, without the threat of imminent insolvency, to change company culture and rituals. This type of management change relies far less on historical financial performance than on looking forward to what might be.

How to Know When You Need It

Sometimes, losing a big customer is the trigger point. But, losing one can be explained away. Losing multiple large customers and key employees should definitely raise your antennae. If you begin to take longer to take products to market and the competition keeps introducing new products faster, these patterns should make you consider getting outside help. Look to your customers and suppliers to provide industry feedback and “intel” on trends and patterns. 

While Others Cut Costs, Innovate

Suppliers know what’s happening and can advise how to improve your product. Eliminate layers in your company. Get back to communication in person. Lost time, will and energy to problem solve creatively is the biggest expense in most businesses. Regain respect for the people doing the work—respect their integrity, intelligence and commitment. Eschew over-control. Break down communication issues between departments. Cross-functional management focuses on running a system, each part dependent on  the other.    

John Whitney said that, when he watched Leonard Bernstein conducting Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, he realized that Bernstein “did many of the same things a good manager does. There were parts of the score where he was deeply involved, working to make sure he got exactly the sound, the nuance he wanted. And he knew what he wanted. But he also knew when the orchestra had it going right, and he wasn’t afraid to lean back and just let it happen, let the musicians do their jobs and listen to the music all come together.”

How about you–are you willing to take a hard look at your organization and determine to become better, even though you are already good? Ever heard the expression, “good is the enemy of great?” Consider ways that you can improve information flow, creativity, problem solving and other soft skills. In addressing these seemingly minor issues while business is good, you prepare the way for an operational turnaround–innovation as some may call it in today’s vernacular!