Tag Archives: thought leadership

Reverse the Mentoring Stereotype

In its most common context, mentoring is understood as someone with experience (and a few grey hairs!) showing someone younger how to perform key job functions. Yet, one of the hottest trends in human resources is termed “reverse mentoring.” Whether due to job loss and the need for new training, or “Second Act” entrepreneurship, or simply the precipitous amount of change being introduced in organizations trying to compete globally, there has arisen a need for this practice where younger workers are now showing the older ones “the ropes.”

While the concept is that exposure to those outside the corporate suite may be good for staying in touch with the values held by newer workers, there are several other benefits. Higher employee retention rates among younger workers are cited as an unexpected, but welcome outcome. Exposure to management issues and how decisions are made are additional upsides.

When Jack Welch was the CEO of General Electric, he  was mentored on how to use the internet by a young employee in her 20s. He saw such promise from the process that he mandated that 500 of his top executives reach out to younger employees to do likewise. These days, mentees are learning how to use social media effectively from their younger mentors. Even at top ad agencies like Ogilvy & Mather, a worldwide managing director admitted that his more youthful mentors had shown him how to enhance his Twitter posts to be less boring. His eyes have been opened to new possibilities and he now plans to utilize Skype and videoconferencing to facilitate distance mentoring across the firm’s 450 offices. HP & Cisco also have reverse mentoring programs in place.

Michelle Rafter, in a blog post entitled “8 Ways to Make a Reverse Mentorship Work For You,” suggests the following guidelines:

1. Find a compatible partner –someone with skills in areas you’re lacking

2. Set expectations- create ground rules for what you want out of a partnership, such as how often you’ll meet and what both parties will get out of it

3. Get your boss’s OK- A lot of reciprocal mentoring can happen on an informal basis. But if you want or need to set up a formal program, you’ll need your manager’s or company’s approval.

4. Be open to suggestions and criticism- learn in days from someone else what one could take decades otherwise by having a thick skin

5. Make it more than just about tech- maybe a younger person could help you learn about sushi, Chinese, popular music, or even how to lead the next generation more effectively

6. Give as much as you get-the relationship should be mutually beneficial

7. Experiment with approaches– a single department, a program that crosses departments, and a multitude of variations

8. Don’t stereotype- not every 45-year-old has the same knowledge or expertise, so don’t assume every Gen Y worker does, either.

Legal Marketing Stats–How Do you Compare?

In surveys by organizations serving the law firm industry, one of the areas studied is marketing activities and spending.

Utilization of Marketing Tactics

Historically proven marketing tactics (yellow pages, legal listings, and client entertainment) are giving way to more focus on Internet-based strategies (Web sites, Search Engine Optimization [SEO],  paid search advertising, blogs, and newer forms of social media) to grow their practice. Firm size drives decisions as to what degree various marketing tactics are utilized. Smaller firms are most likely to use yellow pages and legal listings, but larger firms are more likely to rely on client entertainment. However, while client entertainment is still the leading choice among firms with 11-20 attorneys, it has been dropping off as a primary tactic. Web sites remain the preferred means of marketing over a multi-year period.

Significance of Internet Marketing

Law firms continue to use the Internet to promote their practice, and are using the latest techniques to attract potential clients. Search engine optimization increased throughout the period of 2005-2010. Additionally, more firms began using online legal sites to attract clients. Blog use soared during the same time period. This reveals a latent desire to explore new methods in addition to traditional tactics to attract potential clients.

Perceived Value of Marketing Tactics

Networking and word-of-mouth continue to be integral to building a law practice; however, online activities are also prevalent in integrated marketing campaigns. Web sites and related tactics are considered a primary marketing tool for growing a firm’s practice, and more money is allocated towards this tactic than ever before. Though blogs have been on the rise in efforts to develop clients, it should be noted that very little revenue is allocated towards this activity (1%).
While face-to-face interaction with potential clients is still important, client entertainment is decreasing in its value to attract potential clients, and less money is being allocated towards it than five to ten years ago.
Who Does the Marketing?
Solo practitioners increasingly use outside consultants and administrative staff members (office managers, assistants and secretaries). Mid-size firms (2-5 attorneys) have also increased their reliance on administrative staff members.
Larger firms (6+ attorneys) rely less on marketing consultants and more on other staff members, including marketing managers and related positions.
How Big is the Marketing Budget?
In relation to firm revenues, about one firm in four spends less than 1% on marketing activities. Interestingly:
  • More firms with 11-20 attorneys skimp on marketing than solo practitioners and smaller practices.
  • 39% of solo practices spend over 5%
  • 27% of practices with 2-5 attorneys spend over 5%
What does all this information mean to you as an attorney? I suggest the following:
  1. When small, spend bigger (%-wise)
  2. As you grow, curtail the spending (by %), but spend more wisely
  3. Look for Internet-based marketing strategies to fuel your growth
  4. Decrease your reliance on (but don’t do away with) client events
  5. Explore blogging and social media–either through in-house or contract resources

Root Causes of Executive Failure

Smart leaders make dumb decisions. This statement should come as no surprise. The questions we should ask, though, are why? when? and how? By attacking the root causes and attempting to understand the character issues, we can “peel the onion” and see what is so potently wrong when poor decisions are made and executives fail.

Do you know a leader who sees himself and the company dominating its environment? If so, they collectively are set up for a fall. The basic fallacious assumption is that success in one domain can be infinitely translated into every other domain.

Similarly, the executive who treats the business as a private empire blurs the necessary distinctions between the personality and the entity. Beware the (wo)man who uses position to attempt to carry our personal ambitions. Those who see themselves as stewards of a resource as opposed to royalty seem to avoid this trap.

Know-it-alls are another type of failure waiting to happen. Those who feel they must look polished and do not invite the input of others suffer from hubris that is unhealthy. Being decisive without considering alternative views and related outcomes is not a sign of executive skillfulness.

Slash & burn is not just a rain forest dangerous practice–it is also bad for a talent management policy. We’ve all seen mobster movies where opposing viewpoints are literally snuffed out. When an executive does this inside a business, it shows a lack of appreciation for objectivity. More than likely, decisions will be weaker and mid-course corrections will be missed.

Is the top executive an attention hog? Choosing appearance over substantive management can be a fatal character flaw. Hyper-focus with image can also mean that underlying, important issues like financial performance are not getting the attention they should.

Trying to vision-cast one’s way around a hurdle instead of approaching it head-on is almost always a huge mistake. Shrugging off a problem or pretending it is inconsequential shows immaturity and a lack of executive responsibility. It’s more than okay to admit a problem exists–in doing so, we invite others to help us resolve it and the organization benefits.

Fascination with the past as opposed to staying in the moment is a final way executives doom their organizations to failure. As we’ve heard it said, “what got you here won’t get you there!” Embracing innovation is a good habit of top leaders.

Sydney Finkelstein addresses many of these issues in greater depth in Why Executives Fail, a book published a few years ago that examines case studies of companies that once thrived and then took a nose dive. Similar to Good to Great in its treatment of lessons learned, the book highlights problems with mindsets, information management, and habits.

 

Who Moved My Marketing?

If a traveling salesman from the early 20th century were to be transported in time into modern day, he would have to be astounded at how marketing messages are conveyed. No longer is the day’s work measured by how many individual presentations were made. No–the world has changed quite a bit and we now have access to prospects around the clock through the power of the internet. Printed materials have given away to digital versions, the materials themselves have become flexible tools that are dynamic rather than static, and the information is disseminated through a variety of methods including the ubiquitous social media.

The information in the described value chain is referred to as “content.” The field of content marketing is now the dominant topic in marketing conversations around the world. The infographic below has a lot of messages. Briefly, thought leadership is the goal and may be accomplished through a variety of means. Increased visibility, wider reach, and improved sales are the outcomes of a well-executed content strategy. Credibility is built and enhanced through well-written pieces online that are disseminated via popular applications such as LinkedIn and Twitter.

As you read through the information in the infographic, we suspect it challenges you to think about your own business promotional strategy in new ways. How do you generate content? Who is responsible for amassing it? Through what means do you share your content? Do you have strategies for niche markets? What is your budget (of financial and human capital) for all of this?

Whew! That’s a lot to consider. Think on it. Develop a plan. Get some help if you need to. But, it’s time to stop putting it off. Your company needs a content strategy–because it has become a primary marketing strategy!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Content With No Content

Does your professional services firm have a strategy to produce, distribute and repurpose content for multiple market segments? If it does, you are in the minority. Best practices are to create and disseminate content to enhance search engine rankings. Philosophically, billable professionals have insights to share and there are numerous venues for thought leadership to be established. The fact of the matter is, sadly, that the professionals simply are not easily engaged to sit down and generate the content.

The almighty billable hour, the internal metrics, and the likelihood that most would prefer to do the work than to write about it, are all reasons one may choose not to blog, write articles or white papers, or post updates ad tweets. Simply put, very few firms have much experience creating an environment that acknowledges and rewards contributions to thought leadership that do not produce an immediate return. Performance measurement and incentive compensation practices will need to be revised in order to encourage content production as a preferred behavior within the daily, weekly, etc schedule.

If, like other forms of outsourcing, the firm were to contract with a contractor to produce content on behalf of the billable professionals, it would most likely lack the technical acumen and personal passion necessary to be an intriguing, gripping read. However, contract content editors may be a very good idea. Either a staff person or outsider could help to determine themes, subjects, and nuances that would make the content more readable in layman terminology.

Revise & Refine

 

Become discontent with unsatisfactory content–both in terms of volume and quality. Find ways to change the corporate culture to celebrate the content revolution. Articulate the increased stature and visibility that authors enjoy. Recruit firm leaders to demonstrate their personal commitment to writing–even when it produces no immediate revenues. Finally, make writing an assignment. Section/niche leaders should have a scheduled slot for covering their “beats.” Those aspiring to become partners can demonstrate their drive by taking on writing responsibilities. With content editors, these activities can be managed to successfully produce great content, repurpose it for other social media uses, and promote firm expertise.