Tag Archives: Entrepreneurship

Are You as Tuned In as Zipcar?

Recently, I had the opportunity to teach a group of new entrepreneurs (some not yet in business, some with a year under their belts) how to evaluate a business idea. We discussed the fact that, in the ideation process, there must be a filter by which ideas are judged and refined. Just as heating up gold purges the dross, an idea put under scrutiny can be seen for what is truly valuable, versus the parts of it that need to be cast aside to pursue more pure substance. During one of our sessions on idea refinement at the Cary Innovation Center, we spoke about innovators who had gone before them in various fields. One of the intriguing business models we bantered about was the Zipcar.

Zipcar entered my field of vision about three years ago when I went back to school to get my MBA at the #1 part-time program in the United States, Elon University. Situated near the student stores, and within a stone’s throw of the library and dining hall were a row of cars with the Zipcar logo emblazened on the side. There were assigned spaces closest to the buildings and I wondered what this was all about. A couple months later, we studied Zipcar briefly in an innovation elective class I was taking.

Later still, I read Tuned In and the upstart car rental business showed up again. Robin Chase and Antje Danielson recognized the opportunity while vacationing in Berlin and seeing a similar concept. When they returned to the States, they asked around and realized that there was latent demand for a rental car that would fit an urban lifestyle–creating a submarket for those who only wanted a car for a day, a weekend, or a few hours. The identified a target market of people who didn’t want the hassle of owning a car nor the inconvenience of dealing with the traditional rental car companies.

The authors of the book describe a six step process to create an offering that is a “resonator:”

  1. Find unresolved problems.
  2. Understand buyer personas.
  3. Quantify the impact.
  4. Create Breakthrough Experiences.
  5. Articulate Powerful Ideas.
  6. Establish Authentic Connections.

Without going into a ton of deal, suffice it to say that Chase and Danielson did all six with Zipcar. Of the six, the one I spent the most time discussing with my class of entrepreneurs was “Understand Buyer Personas.”  Basically, this is the concept of characterizing a group of people who share one or more challenges. When a company zeroes in on the concept, they use these personas to drive decisions in product design and development, marketing, and communications. Rather than the mass-produced single item method of the industrial revolution, this approach aims for customization to individual target audiences, the sum of which makes for a good business model.

Zipcar, according to the authors of Tuned In, appeals to the following types of buyers–

  • City dwellers who occasionally need to use a car for a few hours,
  • Mayors, city councilors, and police who deal with parking constraints in major cities, 
  • University administrators who wish to set up a car share service for students,
  • University students who occasionally need a car for a few hours, 
  • Landlords who might offer a car share service as a benefit for tenants, and
  • Business managers who might want to set up a car share service as a perk for employees.

As we discussed this profound market segmentation, my pupils (students) were really challenged to think through their own competitive positioning efforts. Even the mentors I had in the room (present company included) had a bit of a gut check as to how well we did this in our own businesses. How about you? Have you taken the time to really think through this in a way that many small business owners never do–at startup or later?

 

Dirty Martini Intrapreneurship

One  of the portals I use to stay abreast of innovation is called Alltop. It is organized by author and an author by the name of Gregg Fraley caught my attention last week. Gregg had written an article entitled, “Do You Want Innovation or a Dirty Martini.” Rather than describe the whole article for you (or violate his copyright), I offer you the following excerpt:

note: Haley references the topic of management engagement in innovation and some “interesting posts lately byPaul Hobcraft”

I think many high level executives simply don’t know what they have. Until it’s too late.

There are a lot of smart people out there, with great ideas. Talent is something you need if you really want to innovate. And yet, really, most organizations already have that talent. No, not every employee is Jony Ives and is an impact player at that level, but nearly every company has some people that, under the right circumstances, can hit home runs (score goals, set records, win gold, etc.). Ives himself was locked in a closet before Steve Jobs found the key.

In my travels doing talks and such I often have a chance to chat with line workers and middle managers who are beyond frustrated. They have ideas, they have energy, they care about the company — and none of that goodness is being channeled towards innovation. In fact, it’s being actively suppressed in some cases.

The phenomenon that Haley describes is one in which many organizations, even reading about Google or Cisco, who both encourage creativity and innovation, are faltering. Their people are full of great potential that largely goes untapped because there is not a means to commercialize new ideas (or even pursue new methods) because management is not intentional about cultivating input from others–especially those outside the management side of the building. Haley goes on to argue that even those with creative talent, who are often recruited to organizations that need the proverbial “breath of fresh air,” find that their approach is not valued and they begin looking for their next opportunity too soon after joining an organization that so desperately needs them but is not accommodating to them.

He says, “C-suite types, hear this, if you knew  how much talent is wasting away right under your nose, you’d cry in your martini. Don’t believe it? Ask. Ask a sampling of your people the simple question — where are the hidden gems around here? You’ll find out things you didn’t know. People with secret projects, big ideas they’ve been holding back, crazy ideas that just might work…Want to turn the situation around? Ask another question — what’s holding you back?”

I would add to the questions he asks the following:

What are you doing to foster a culture of innovation?

Here are some suggestions–

  1. Change the way you form work teams. Build diversity of thought into as many teams as possible.
  2. Change your own role from decision maker to facilitator. See yourself as primarily responsible to help others shine and succeed.
  3. Create a knowledge management system that captures lessons learned and best practices to be disseminated broadly and consistently.
  4. Celebrate when an employee takes initiative. Find ways to acknowledge them openly.
  5. Get rid of the traditional research and development process. Instead of a department, create an inter-departmental group that represents not just different disciplines, but also different levels of experience and different demographics.

Intrapreneurship is on the rise among savvy competitors. It does not, however,  come without a price–ego has to be checked at the door and individuals valued for their unique contributions.  Your challenge is to retain creative talent that otherwise would start their own businesses or work for more progressive competitors!

Stop the Rhetoric About SmallBiz, Politicians!

We small business owners watched the political conventions over the last month and were listening to what the pols had to say about watching out for our interests. Numerous speakers took the podium to address an economic challenge not seen in this generation. We of the post-Baby Boom era are wondering whether our way of life will bounce back, rather than when. So many people have lost jobs, big companies have lost revenues they had taken years to build, and small business owners have lost both jobs and revenues as well as their livelihoods. We are, to say the least, keenly interested in whether we are being heard by Washington and our state capitals. We are certain that social security and probably Medicare will not be there for us when we reach retirement age. We truly do not care what happens to those programs–tell us what is going to be done to help us with issues we face!

Saying that small business is the backbone of the economy is not enough–both presidential candidates kowtowed to the convention audiences and said what they had to, but it wasn’t convincing. Part of the reason the comments seemed disingenuous is that “small business” is a catch-all phrase that does not distinguish between differing types of enterprises. As  others have pointed out, a restaurant is a very different type of company than a small manufacturing concern.  Dan Danner, the CEO of  the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) says, “There is always a tendency for lawmakers to think that small businesses are just smaller versions of General Motors, and they’re not.” Main Street businesses have very different perspectives on policies that are developed by government. Policies  covering health care, trade, taxation, and ecology often reflect the lobbying power of big business over small business. Chris Holman, chair of the National Small Business Association, says that politicians often “go and vote against small business.”

Data from the Small Business Administration shows that small business has been hit harder than big business by our recent recession. One of the statistics–share of nonfarm GDP from private companies–fell from 48+% in 2002 to <44% in 2010. With home building and related trades suffering from the aftermath of the mortgage crisis, there has been a very slow return to stability –let alone growth–in many small business sectors. Uncertainty over potential changes in the tax code and Obamacare has many small business owners anxious as to what to plan for and how to develop strategies  focused on more than just a few months down the road.

Bloomberg Businessweek writer Peter S. Green profiled several small business owners in the September 17-23 issue who spoke to the issues above. Tom Campbell, who owns the Regulator Bookshop in Durham, NC, spoke out against the unfair advantage online retailers like Amazon have due to sales tax exemptions. He’d like to see the exemptions lifted to create a more competitive playing field. The 20 employees under his supervision have concerns about the future of small bookstores who have to compete in an environment where their customers pay an additional 7+% due to the imbalance in tax liability.

Tom Secor, who owns Durable Corp. in Norwalk, OH, feels that the tax system favors larger businesses. Preferential loopholes in the tax code seem to favor those who have the klout to petition government to listen to them, he says. “Big business is getting the better end of this because they have the money to spend.” Secor’s comments are similar to those voiced by Richard Eidlin, director of public policy at the American Sustainable Business Council. Eidlin decries subsidies offered to big business–whether broadband spectrum or ethanol price guarantees. He says, “If there’s going to be corporate welfare, you could throw some of that at the small corporations.”

In summary, small businesses want someone who understands their needs, can develop programs for sectors of the small business economy, and won’t bog them down in paperwork and red tape. While few actually believe that a president can personally be attuned to these issues, we hope against hope that they will make it a part of their platform and governance!

Qualifications of a Turnaround Adviser

An effective turnaround adviser must be uniquely qualified to deal with crises and prepared to assume responsibility for the company’s success. The three most important background credentials for an adviser are as follows:

  • an identification with the needs of declining companies
  • specific industry expertise in your industry or a related one, and
  • a track record of overcoming adversity and making the most of poor situations

General Requirements

When evaluating possible advisers, teams should look for someone with both practical, hands-on capabilities and an educational or research-based knowledge of the issues at hand. Make sure you do not have a novice attempting on-the-job training at your expense. It would be wise to find someone who has performed at least a dozen turnarounds individually and who has access to other personnel with the same or greater levels of experience. Furthermore, familiarity with research and educational publications within your industry that highlight concepts of turnaround practice gives an adviser a more objective view of workable solutions to difficult problems.

Industry Expertise

A background in your industry prepares an adviser to face the peculiar, industry-specific dilemmas that invariably arise. Previous work with companies of various sizes and in various markets furnishes the adviser with extensive–and beneficial–exposure to your industry. A proven ability to learn new markets overnight and employ existing operating resources effectively will result in quicker turnarounds. Examine the methods the adviser used with prior clients and determine whether similar programs would make a comfortable fit for your business. “Sanitized” copies of turnaround plans produced for other clients may even be requested.

Success Rate

A turnaround adviser’s success rate with previous clients is an important statistic. Much as a baseball team manager would hesitate to hire a pinch hitter who batted below .200, the executive team must exercise caution in selecting someone to captain the turnaround team. Most advisers who have been in business for more than five years can claim a one out of two (50 percent) or greater rate of success. To reduce risk, the team should look for an adviser who can claim–and substantiate–an 80 percent or better success rate. Once a successful adviser has been located, the team shout contact references and ask what made the effort a success.

Crisis Management

Effective turnaround advisers must possess certain qualities and characteristics that uniquely prepare them to deal with crises. The first such quality is “multilevel simultaneous thinking”–the ability to solve problems on several different levels at the same time. This is a skill gained over time through both education and experience. The ability to interact with numerous employees to resolve multiple dilemmas and relate to each in an appropriate manner is also essential.

Negotiating with Opponents

A turnaround adviser’s ability to search for all the important details, address issues with a penchant for opportunism, and follow through on commitments will also further the turnaround process. Note that “opponents” emerge in turnarounds virtually overnight; they tend to be former allies such as lenders and vendors. Being able to decipher an opponent’s true bottom line and make an offer that more than covers his or her threshold yet preserves the company’s position will save the company precious time during the turnaround. Indeed, many of these opponents in negotiations will return once again as allies when the business emerges from its decline. In completing a cycle of commitments to stakeholders, the turnaround adviser should ensure that every promise made can be carried out to the letter. Such consistency in following through on promises will enhance the builder’s credibility and image in the community.

Often employing little more than intuition, a crisis-oriented adviser can anticipate pitfalls and plan around them before trouble occurs. Being able to foresee a turn of events is a rare quality to begin with, but is especially valuable when coupled with the creativity that allows the adviser to adapt the flexible strategic plan to the changing demands of the situation. This ability to adapt to change is a necessary elastic band in the adviser’s armor, without which all other tactical weapons would be useless.

 

How Do Successful Businesses Manage Their Finances?

Once the marketing plan has been developed and the product (service) mix defined, successful executive teams develop a financial plan to determine whether their offerings are economically feasible. Such financial considerations as sources of funding, cash availability, and marketing investment need to be evaluated.

Again, no department or manager can operate in a vacuum during this planning process; it is highly likely that staff in the marketing, finance and operations areas will collaborate on the development of plans for their respective areas, as well as on all aspects of an overall business plan. When a new project, product, or service is contemplated, the finance and accounting staff, in conjunction with the business owner(s), head of marketing, and head of operations should evaluate the company’s ability to:

  • get the initiative off the ground,
  • fund it during development and launch, and
  • continue to support it through sales process and beyond.

Successful businesses are always careful to perform all necessary analysis of these three aspects of innovation. They never assume the financial capability to launch a new idea guarantees success; rather, it is understood that the ability to begin a project is of no value if momentum cannot be sustained through the point of post-sale customer service and satisfaction. The cash required to pay overhead and ongoing obligations when no revenues are coming in from the new initiative can put a company into bankruptcy if not anticipated beforehand.

Securing capital sources is another step in sound business financial planning. The timing and amounts of cash infusions are critical considerations within the overall plan. Sometimes, the lure of a large project or contract can cloud judgment. Without adequate preparation for the cash impact of “ramping up” for new scopes of work, sales volume can become a curse. In fact, some businesses become specific in their growth goals so as to not outstrip precious capital reserve allocation guidelines. (This is not to say, however, that financial instruments such as contract financing are not a way to “have one’s cake and eat it too.”)

Making sure that the business has the wherewithal to “scale” to fit customer demand is important. There will invariably be times when the requirements to pay down payables balances will be instituted by lenders or investors. Likewise, receivables balances cannot become too large too quickly without causing alarm as to the liquidity of the business to meet obligations. Creating a working capital account that is adequately funded to weather fluctuations in business volume–in either direction–is wisdom. How one goes about pre-funding it is “science!”

Businesses that plan for their monetary requirements at every stage of innovation will consistently make more money than those that “fly by the seat of their pants.”  Developing financial plans that support marketing and operational plans is essential for profit maximization. The results of this planning are recommendations to either scrap, revise, or move forward speedily with exciting projects that can lead to increased brand awareness, market share, revenues, and profitability. However, one would do well to remember that no going concern has ever gone broke because its executive team did not start a new project.